Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Git pull after forced update

Tags:

git

git-pull

I just squashed some commits with git rebase and did a git push --force (which is evil, I know).

Now the other software engineers have a different history and when they do a git pull, Git will merge. Is there a way to fix this, except doing a rm my-repo; git clone [email protected]:my-repo.git?

I need something like the opposite of git push --force, but git pull --force did not give the intended results.

like image 401
iblue Avatar asked Mar 21 '12 22:03

iblue


1 Answers

To receive the new commits

git fetch 

Reset

You can reset the commit for a local branch using git reset.

To change the commit of a local branch:

git reset origin/main --hard 

Be careful though, as the documentation puts it:

Resets the index and working tree. Any changes to tracked files in the working tree since <commit> are discarded.

If you want to actually keep whatever changes you've got locally - do a --soft reset instead. Which will update the commit history for the branch, but not change any files in the working directory (and you can then commit them).

Rebase

You can replay your local commits on top of any other commit/branch using git rebase:

git rebase -i origin/main 

This will invoke rebase in interactive mode where you can choose how to apply each individual commit that isn't in the history you are rebasing on top of.

If the commits you removed (with git push -f) have already been pulled into the local history, they will be listed as commits that will be reapplied - they would need to be deleted as part of the rebase or they will simply be re-included into the history for the branch - and reappear in the remote history on the next push.

Use the help git command --help for more details and examples on any of the above (or other) commands.

like image 169
AD7six Avatar answered Oct 22 '22 08:10

AD7six