I have a git repository with master
and alt
branches. alt
branch contains modified version of master
code, and i am trying to merge changes from master
to alt
like this:
git merge --squash master
Merge results in conflict:
Auto-merging myproject/foo/bar CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in myproject/foo/bar Squash commit -- not updating HEAD Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
After I resolve conflicts and commit changes everything seems fine, but when i run git merge --squash master
again (without doing any changes on any branches) i will get same conflict error.
Why is that? What did i miss?
Often, merge conflicts happen when people make different changes to the same line of the same file, or when one person edits a file and another person deletes the same file. You must resolve all merge conflicts before you can merge a pull request on GitHub.
You should consider using squash if your team prefers a linear project history. This means that the history held by your main branch should not contain merges. A squash merge makes it possible to keep changes condensed to a single commit, supporting this strategy nicely.
A merge conflict is an event that occurs when Git is unable to automatically resolve differences in code between two commits. When all the changes in the code occur on different lines or in different files, Git will successfully merge commits without your help.
By squash
ing the merge, you've created a commit which has the effect of, but is not really, a merge.
That is, the working tree has the modifications you'd expect, but the metadata doesn't: crucially, the commit doesn't have two parents (one on master
and one on alt
) and therefore subsequent merges can't figure out the last common ancestor.
squash
master
. I'll accumulate any useful information into the squashed commit, but specifically don't want this feature's incremental development history polluting the master
commit timeline.rebase -i
to squash their commits, but this is easiersquash
Any merge where you want to keep the history and ancestry metadata intact, such as any time you want repeated recursive merges to work correctly, specifically what the OP is trying to do.
squash
just isn't really a good default, which is why it isn't the default.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With