Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

getting all values from a concurrent dictionary and clearing it without losing data

Tags:

c#

.net

I am adding/updating objects into a concurrent dictionary and periodically (every minute) flushing the dictionary, so my code looks something like this:

    private static ConcurrentDictionary<string, Metric> _metrics = new ConcurrentDictionary<string, Metric>();

    public static void IncrementCountMetricBy(string name, int count)
    {           
        _metrics.AddOrUpdate(....
    }

    public static Metric[] Flush()
    {
        var flushedMetrics = _metrics;
        _metrics = new ConcurrentDictionary<string, Metric>();
        return flushedMetrics.Values.ToArray();
    }

now I'm not sure if it's possible for this code to lose some objects/updates

like image 233
Omu Avatar asked Jun 19 '13 15:06

Omu


People also ask

Is ConcurrentDictionary clear thread-safe?

Also, although all methods of ConcurrentDictionary<TKey,TValue> are thread-safe, not all methods are atomic, specifically GetOrAdd and AddOrUpdate. To prevent unknown code from blocking all threads, the user delegate that's passed to these methods is invoked outside of the dictionary's internal lock.

Is ConcurrentDictionary AddOrUpdate thread-safe?

It is thread safe in your usage. It becomes not thread safe when the delegate passed to AddOrUpdate has side effects, because those side effects may be executed twice for the same key and existing value.

What is the use of ConcurrentDictionary in C#?

ConcurrentDictionary is thread-safe collection class to store key/value pairs. It internally uses locking to provide you a thread-safe class. It provides different methods as compared to Dictionary class. We can use TryAdd, TryUpdate, TryRemove, and TryGetValue to do CRUD operations on ConcurrentDictionary.

What is the purpose of the ConcurrentDictionary TKey TValue class?

Represents a thread-safe collection of key/value pairs that can be accessed by multiple threads concurrently.


1 Answers

Yes, you could potentially lose some data there:

  1. The incrementing thread could read the _metrics field and get the old dictionary, and then be interrupted
  2. The flushing thread then replaces the _metrics field with the new dictionary
  3. The flushing thread than called Values.ToArray()
  4. The incrementing thread then calls AddOrUpdate on a dictionary which is no longer being looked at by anything. (The one that it fetched in step 1.)

To put it another way, imagine that your IncrementMetricCountBy method is actually:

public static void IncrementCountMetricBy(string name, int count)
{
    var tmp = _metrics;
    Thread.Sleep(1000);           
    tmp.AddOrUpdate(...);
}

If you can see why that isn't safe, the same argument applies in your current code.

As far as I can see there isn't anything particularly simple that you can do with ConcurrentDictionary here. One option would be to take a snapshot of all the keys, and then remove them all:

var keys = _metrics.Keys.ToList();
var values = new List<Metric>();
foreach (var key in keys)
{
    Metric metric;
    if (_metrics.TryRemove(key, out metric))
    {
        values.Add(metric);
    }
}
return values;

The dictionary may not be empty when you return, but you shouldn't lose any data. (You may get metrics updated since the method started, and any update which happens after a key has been removed will end up re-adding it, but that should be okay.)

like image 193
Jon Skeet Avatar answered Oct 07 '22 21:10

Jon Skeet