So, I'd like to know how many results I'll be getting back from a RESTful uri GET request. I don't know of any way to do that at this point. Is there a way to do that? Since REST just throws out properties, I don't know if it is able to take a count of its results, but it can skip results and take a subset of results.
Anybody have any suggestions?
Oh my setup is a LINQ to SQL that populates a queriable generic List. The data service makes that list available. I've tried getting a count on the list, but I always get the max rows of the database back, and that isn't what I'm looking for.
just use count() or you can use count of mysql also.
Each of the status code fields has an object as its value with a field called doc_count . In each status code field, locate the doc_count field and note its value, which represents the total number of API calls for the current status code within the specified time range.
The most common are: GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE, but there are several others. There is no limit to the number of methods that can be defined and this allows for future methods to be specified without breaking existing infrastructure.
Other people might have objections to this concept, but, this seems reasonable to me:
HEAD /your/api HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:58:17 GMT
Content-Type: application/xml; charset=UTF-8
Content-Length: 89
X-Result-Count: 100000000
And then:
GET /your/api HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:58:17 GMT
Content-Type: application/xml; charset=UTF-8
Content-Length: 89
X-Result-Count: 100000000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<results>
100000000 results go here.
</results>
Note: A HEAD request is used here to obtain the count without having to pull the full data set. HEAD requests retrieve only the HTTP headers, not the body of the response.
This would be the most RESTful way I can think of indicating how many results you're gonna get back before you send it over the wire. The main trick is just coming up with the best header name for it. X-Result-Count
is decent, but if you can find prior art and reuse their header name choice, that would be even better (as long as they didn't name it something really dumb). That said, I don't expect you'll have much luck, so you should probably stick with X-Result-Count
.
Also, I think you may have misunderstood what "REST" actually entails. There's no reason you can't give a representation by range. For example:
GET /your/api?page=1&perpage=10 HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:58:17 GMT
Content-Type: application/xml; charset=UTF-8
Content-Length: 101
X-Result-Count: 10
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<results>
First 10 results of 100000000 go here.
</results>
However, to be RESTful, you need to be able to tell the client about the representation identified by /your/api?range=0-9
or /your/api?page=1&perpage=10
without using out-of-band information. For example, if your /your/api
page would return too many results, do a temporary redirect to /your/api?page=1&perpage=10
, and include hyperlinks to /your/api?page=2&perpage=10
. Note that a hyperlink in this context could be something simple like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<results>
<result>
This is a result.
</result>
<result>
This is also a result.
</result>
<link rel="next" href="/your/api?page=3&perpage=2" />
<link rel="prev" href="/your/api?page=1&perpage=2" />
</results>
Now the information to navigate the results of your API calls is in-band and actually RESTful.
Essentially, REST is plain-old-HTTP with caching done right and usually sensible URIs thrown in for good measure. It's also "hypertext as the engine of application state" (i.e. resources should link to other resources). It is not a protocol, it's an architectural style. Anyone who tells you differently had better be named Roy Fielding.
Addenda:
If you want to indicate the total count versus the page count, you can define the header like so:
X-Result-Count: 0-9/100000000
Or adjust as necessary.
Why don't you make your resource handle queries for that type of metadata? Suppose that
GET /items
returns your list of items like this:
<items count="5" modified="2009-10-22">
<item url="/items/first" name="First Item" />
<item url="/items/second" name="Second Item" />
...
</items>
Then something like:
GET /items?info
could return an empty list like this:
<items count="5" modified="2009-10-22" type="info" />
or possibly a generic info document like this:
<info>
<items count="5" modified="2009-10-22" url="/items" />
</info>
You could also implement an "info" resource like this:
GET /info?items&users
which might return:
<info>
<items count="5" modified="2009-10-22" url="/items" />
<users count="8" modified="2009-10-05" url="/users" />
</info>
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With