To get the class name of an instance in Python: Use the type() function and __name__ to get the type or class of the Object/Instance. Using the combination of the __class__ and __name__ to get the type or class of the Object/Instance.
A fully-qualified class name in Java contains the package that the class originated from. Also, an inner class is a class that is another class member. So, the fully-qualified name of an inner class can be obtained using the getName() method.
The __qualname__ attribute means qualified name in Python. It gives you a dotted path to the name of the target object. Using __qualname__ is useful with nested structures, such as when you have a method inside a class.
__class__ is an attribute on the object that refers to the class from which the object was created. a. __class__ # Output: <class 'int'> b. __class__ # Output: <class 'float'> After simple data types, let's now understand the type function and __class__ attribute with the help of a user-defined class, Human .
With the following program
#!/usr/bin/env python
import foo
def fullname(o):
klass = o.__class__
module = klass.__module__
if module == 'builtins':
return klass.__qualname__ # avoid outputs like 'builtins.str'
return module + '.' + klass.__qualname__
bar = foo.Bar()
print(fullname(bar))
and Bar
defined as
class Bar(object):
def __init__(self, v=42):
self.val = v
the output is
$ ./prog.py
foo.Bar
If you're still stuck on Python 2, you'll have to use __name__
instead of __qualname__
, which is less informative for nested classes - a class Bar
nested in a class Foo
will show up as Bar
instead of Foo.Bar
:
def fullname(o):
klass = o.__class__
module = klass.__module__
if module == '__builtin__':
return klass.__name__ # avoid outputs like '__builtin__.str'
return module + '.' + klass.__name__
The provided answers don't deal with nested classes. Though it's not available until Python 3.3 (PEP 3155), you really want to use the __qualname__
of the class instead of the __name__
. Otherwise, a class like
class Foo:
class Bar: # this one
pass
will show up as just Bar
instead of Foo.Bar
.
(You'll still need to attach the __module__
to the qualname separately - __qualname__
is not intended to include module names.)
Here's one based on Greg Bacon's excellent answer, but with a couple of extra checks:
__module__
can be None
(according to the docs), and also for a type like str
it can be __builtin__
(which you might not want appearing in logs or whatever). The following checks for both those possibilities:
def fullname(o):
module = o.__class__.__module__
if module is None or module == str.__class__.__module__:
return o.__class__.__name__
return module + '.' + o.__class__.__name__
(There might be a better way to check for __builtin__
. The above just relies on the fact that str is always available, and its module is always __builtin__
)
Consider using the inspect
module which has functions like getmodule
which might be what are looking for:
>>>import inspect
>>>import xml.etree.ElementTree
>>>et = xml.etree.ElementTree.ElementTree()
>>>inspect.getmodule(et)
<module 'xml.etree.ElementTree' from
'D:\tools\python2.5.2\lib\xml\etree\ElementTree.pyc'>
For python3.7 I use:
".".join([obj.__module__, obj.__name__])
Getting:
package.subpackage.ClassName
__module__
would do the trick.
Try:
>>> import re
>>> print re.compile.__module__
re
This site suggests that __package__
might work for Python 3.0; However, the examples given there won't work under my Python 2.5.2 console.
Some people (e.g. https://stackoverflow.com/a/16763814/5766934) arguing that __qualname__
is better than __name__
.
Here is an example that shows the difference:
$ cat dummy.py
class One:
class Two:
pass
$ python3.6
>>> import dummy
>>> print(dummy.One)
<class 'dummy.One'>
>>> print(dummy.One.Two)
<class 'dummy.One.Two'>
>>> def full_name_with_name(klass):
... return f'{klass.__module__}.{klass.__name__}'
>>> def full_name_with_qualname(klass):
... return f'{klass.__module__}.{klass.__qualname__}'
>>> print(full_name_with_name(dummy.One)) # Correct
dummy.One
>>> print(full_name_with_name(dummy.One.Two)) # Wrong
dummy.Two
>>> print(full_name_with_qualname(dummy.One)) # Correct
dummy.One
>>> print(full_name_with_qualname(dummy.One.Two)) # Correct
dummy.One.Two
Note, it also works correctly for builtins:
>>> print(full_name_with_qualname(print))
builtins.print
>>> import builtins
>>> builtins.print
<built-in function print>
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With