I'd like to check if a user account already exists in the system.
$SamAc = Read-Host 'What is your username?'
$User = Get-ADUser -Filter {sAMAccountName -eq "$SamAc"}
I'm not sure why, but $User
will always return null even if {sAMAccountName -eq "$SamAc"}
is supposed to be true.
What am I missing here?
Edit:
This is what was missing:
$User = Get-ADUser -Filter "sAMAccountName -eq '$SamAc'"
Editor's note: The script block ({ ... }
) was replaced with a string.
There is valuable information in the existing answers, but I think a more focused summary is helpful. Note that the original form of this answer advocated strict avoidance of script blocks ({...}
) and AD-provider variable evaluation, but this has been replaced with more nuanced recommendations.
Option A: Letting the AD provider resolve - stand-alone only - variable references:
Get-ADUser -Filter 'sAMAccountName -eq $SamAc' # note the '...' quoting
Note the use of '...'
, i.e. a verbatim (single-quoted) string, because the string's value is to be passed as-is to the AD provider (cmdlet).
{ ... }
), Get-ADUser -Filter { sAMAccountName -eq $SamAc }
, technically works too (its verbatim content, sans {
and }
, is converted to a string), it is conceptually problematic - see bottom section.Do not quote the variable reference ()."$SamAc"
Use only stand-alone variable references (e.g, $SamAc
); expressions are not supported (e.g., $user.SamAccountName
or "$name*"
or $("admin_" + $SamAc)
); if necessary, use an intermediate, auxiliary variable; e.g.:
$name = "admin_" + $SamAc; Get-ADUser -Filter 'sAMAccountName -eq $name'
Generally, only a subset of PowerShell's operators are supported, and even those that are do not always behave the same way - see bottom section.
Caveat: If you use Get-ADUser
via an implicitly remoting module - whether self-created via Import-PSSession
or, in PowerShell v7+, via the Windows Compatibility feature - neither '...'
nor { ... }
works, because the variable references are then evaluated on the remote machine, looking for the variables there (in vain); if (Get-Command Get-ADUser).CommandType
returns Function
, you're using an implicitly remoting module.
Option B: Using PowerShell's string interpolation (expandable strings), up front:
Get-ADUser -Filter "sAMAccountName -eq `"$SamAc`"" # note the "..." quoting
Using "..."
, i.e. an expandable (double-quoted) string makes PowerShell interpolate (expand) all variable references and subexpression up front, in which case the AD provider sees only the (variable-free) result.
As shown above, for string operands embedded quoting then is necessary.
'...'
is a simpler alternative to `"...`"
(`"
is an _escaped "
), but note that this assumes that an expanded value doesn't itself contain '
, which is a distinct possibility with last names, for instance.Also, be sure to `
-escape constants such as $true
, $false
, and $null
inside the "..."
string, which are always recognized by the AD provider; i.e., use `$true
, `$false
and `$null
, so that PowerShell doesn't expand them up front.
Caveat: Using an expandable string does not work with all data types, at least not directly: for instance, the default stringification of a [datetime]
instance (e.g., 01/15/2018 16:00:00
is not recognized by the AD provider; in this case, embedding the result of a call to the instance's .ToFileTime()
(or .ToFileTimeUtc()
?) method into the string may be necessary (as suggested in the comments on this post); I'm unclear on whether there are other data types that require similar workarounds.
On the plus side, string interpolation allows you to embed entire expressions and even commands in a "..."
string, using $(...)
, the subexpression operator; e.g.:
# Property access.
Get-ADUser -Filter "sAMAccountName -eq `"$($user.SamAccountName)`""
# String concatenation
Get-ADUser -Filter "sAMAccountName -eq `"$('admin_' + $SamAc)`""
Any argument you pass to -Filter
is coerced to a string first, before it is passed to the Get-ADUser
cmdlet, because the -Filter
parameter is of type [string]
- as it is for all provider cmdlets that support this parameter; verify with Get-ADUser -?
With -Filter
in general, it is up to the cmdlet (the underlying PowerShell provider) to interpret that string, using a domain-specific (query) language that often has little in common with PowerShell.
In the case of Get-ADUser
, that domain-specific language (query language) is documented in Get-Help about_ActiveDirectory_Filter
.
With Get-AdUser
, the language supported by -Filter
is certainly modeled on PowerShell, but it has many limitations and some behavioral differences that one must be aware of, notably:
As Santiago Squarzon points out, these limitations and difference stem from the fact that the language is translated into an LDAP filter behind the scenes, it is therefore constrained by its features and behaviors. (Note that you can use the -LDAPFilter
parameter in lieu of -Filter
to directly pass an LDAP filter).
Only a limited subset of PowerShell operators are supported, and some exhibit different behavior; here's a non-exhaustive list:
-like
/ -notlike
only support *
in wildcard expressions (not also ?
and character sets/ranges ([...]
)
'*'
by itself represents any nonempty value (unlike in PowerShell's wildcard expressions, where it also matches an empty one).-eq ""
or -eq $null
to test fields for being empty, use-notlike '*'
.DistinguishedName
, only support '*'
by itself, not as part of a larger pattern; that is, they only support an emptiness test.-lt
/ -le
and -gt
/ -ge
only perform lexical comparison.Get-ADUser
command to quietly return $null
.As stated, only stand-alone variable references are supported (e.g, $SamAc
), not also expressions (e.g., $SamAc.Name
or $("admin_" + $SamAc)
)
While you can use a script block ({ ... }
) to pass what becomes a string to -Filter
, and while this syntax can be convenient for embedding quotes, it is problematic for two reasons:
It may mislead you to think that you're passing a piece of PowerShell code; notably, you may be tempted to use unsupported operators and expressions rather than simple variable references.
It creates unnecessary work (though that is unlikely to matter in practice), because you're forcing PowerShell to parse the filter as PowerShell code first, only to have the result converted back to a string when the argument is bound to -Filter
.
This one bit me when I first started to work with the ActiveDirectory module, and it was a pain to figure out.
The -Filter
parameter for the ActiveDirectory module cmdlets is actually looking for a string. When you do {sAMAccountName -eq "$SamAc"}
as the value, it is actually looking for "sAMAccountName -eq ""`$SamAc"""
Basically, Powershell parses the parameter and turns its value into a string, and will not interpolate the variable. Try building the string before hand, and it should work.
Something like this:
$SamAc = Read-Host 'What is your username?'
$filter = "sAmAccountname -eq ""$SamAc"""
$User = Get-ADUser -Filter $filter
I have to comment on this because it really aggravated me to sort this out.
Joseph Alcorn has the right idea. The filter parameter takes a string and then evaluates that in order to process the filter. What trips people up with this is that you are given the option to use curly brackets instead {}, and this doesn't work as you'd expect if you were using Where... it still has to be treated like a string.
$SamAc = Read-Host 'What is your username?'
$User = Get-ADUser -Filter "sAMAccountName -eq '$SamAc'"
I recommend sticking to quotes to make it more clear/readable for yourself and others and to avoid potential syntax errors, or stick to Where{} in the pipeline. When doing so, I find it best to use double-quotes on the outside & single-quotes on the inside so you still get intellisense detection on the variable.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With