How do you write a recursive method PowerSet(String input) that prints out all possible combinations of a string that is passed to it?
For example: PowerSet("abc") will print out abc, ab, ac, bc, a, b, c
I have seen some recursive solutions with loops, but in this case no loops are allowed.
Any ideas?
Edit: The required method has only one parameter, i.e. String input.
For a given set S , the power set can be found by generating all binary numbers between 0 and 2n-1 , where n is the size of the set. For example, for the set S {x, y, z} , generate binary numbers from 0 to 23-1 and for each number generated, the corresponding set can be found by considering set bits in the number.
You surely can use loops in a recursive function. What makes a function recursive is only the fact that the function calls itself at some point in its execution path. However you should have some condition to prevent infinite recursion calls from which your function can't return.
So no, every problem that can be solved iterative can be solved with recursion and vice-versa. If you do 1:1 conversion, Big-O notation stays the same. It can, however, still be better to use an iterative algorithm over a recursive because you can do different things.
The powerset of abcd
is the union of the power-sets of abc
, abd
, acd
(plus the set abcd
itself*).
P(`abcd`) = {`abcd`} + P(`abc`) + P(`abd`) + P(`acd`) + P(`bcd`)
* Note that the empty set, which is a member of P(abcd) is also a member of P(abc), P(abd), ... so the equivalence stated above holds.
Recursively, P(abc
) = {abc
} + P(ab
) + P(ac
), and so on
A first approach, in pseudocode, could be:
powerset(string) {
add string to set;
for each char in string {
let substring = string excluding char,
add powerset(substring) to set
}
return set;
}
The recursion ends when the string is empty (because it never enters the loop).
If your really want no loops, you will have to convert that loop to another recursion.
Now we want to generate ab
, ac
and cb
from abc
powerset(string) {
add string to set;
add powerset2(string,0) to set;
return set
}
powerset2(string,pos) {
if pos<length(string) then
let substring = (string excluding the char at pos)
add powerset(substring) to set
add powerset2(string,pos+1) to set
else
add "" to set
endif
return set
}
Another approach implement a recursive function P
that either removes the first character from its argument, or does not. (Here +
means set union, .
means concatenation and λ
is the empty string)
P(abcd) = P(bcd) + a.P(bcd)
P(bcd) = P(cd) + b.P(cd)
P(cd) = P(d) + c.P(d)
P(d) = λ+d //particular case
Then
P(d) = λ+d
R(cd) = P(d) + c.P(d) = λ + d + c.(λ+d) = λ + d + c + cd
R(bcd) = P(cd) + b.P(cd) = λ + d + c + cd + b.(λ + d + c + cd)
= λ + d + c + cd + b + bd + bc + bcd
P(abcd) = λ + d + c + cd + b + bd + bc + bcd
+ aλ + ad + ac + acd + ab + abd + abc + abcd
If loops were allowed, then P
is out power-set function. Otherwise, we would need a one-parameter loopless function for concatenating a given character to a given set of strings (which obviously are two things).
Some tweak could be possible by playing with String.replace
(if a String
result is desired, or by replacing Set
with List
(so that the "additional" parameter is actually the first element in the list).
This will also do the trick:
var powerset = function(arr, prefix, subsets) {
subsets = subsets || [];
prefix = prefix || [];
if (arr.length) {
powerset(arr.slice(1), prefix.concat(arr[0]), subsets);
powerset(arr.slice(1), prefix, subsets);
} else {
subsets.push(prefix);
}
return subsets;
};
powerset('abc');
Well if you don't have loops, emulate one with recursion, using iterators this is acutally quite simple.
public final Set<Set<Integer>> powerSet(Set<Integer> set) {
Set<Set<Integer>> powerSet = new HashSet<>();
powerSet(set, powerSet, set.iterator());
return powerSet;
}
public final void powerSet(Set<Integer> set, Set<Set<Integer>> powerSet, Iterator<Integer> iterator) {
if(iterator.hasNext()) {
Integer exlude = iterator.next();
Set<Integer> powThis = new HashSet<Integer>();
powThis.addAll(set);
powThis.remove(exlude);
powerSet.add(powThis);
powerSet(powThis, powerSet, powThis.iterator());
powerSet(set, powerSet, iterator);
}
}
//usage
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<>();
set.add(1);
set.add(2);
set.add(3);
set.add(4);
log.error(powerSet(set).toString());
A recursive version of the generic solution proposed by João Silva :
public static <T> Set<Set<T>> powerSet2(Set<T> originalSet) {
Set<Set<T>> sets = new HashSet<Set<T>>();
if (originalSet.isEmpty()) {
sets.add(new HashSet<T>());
return sets;
}
List<T> list = new ArrayList<T>(originalSet);
T head = list.get(0);
Set<T> rest = new HashSet<T>(list.subList(1, list.size()));
addSets(sets, powerSet(rest), head);
return sets;
}
private static <T> void addSets(Set<Set<T>> sets, Set<Set<T>> setsToAdd, T head) {
Iterator<Set<T>> iterator = setsToAdd.iterator();
if (iterator.hasNext()) {
Set<T> set = iterator.next();
iterator.remove();
Set<T> newSet = new HashSet<T>();
newSet.add(head);
newSet.addAll(set);
sets.add(newSet);
sets.add(set);
addSets(sets, setsToAdd, head);
}
}
I extract the recursive addSets method to transform the original for
loop:
for (Set<T> set : powerSet(rest)) {
Set<T> newSet = new HashSet<T>();
newSet.add(head);
newSet.addAll(set);
sets.add(newSet);
sets.add(set);
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With