Ok, it's known that GC implicitly calls Finalize
methods on objects when it identifies that object as garbage. But what happens if I do a GC.Collect()
? Are the finalizers still executed? A stupid question maybe, but someone asked me this and I answered a "Yes" and then I thought: "Was that fully correct?"
System. gc() forces the garbage collector to run, while the Finalize() method of your object defines what garbage collector should do when collecting this specific object.
It performs a blocking garbage collection of all generations. All objects, regardless of how long they have been in memory, are considered for collection; however, objects that are referenced in managed code are not collected. Use this method to force the system to try to reclaim the maximum amount of available memory.
Finalize method, is used to release unmanaged resources before an object is garbage-collected. If obj does not have a finalizer or the GC has already signaled the finalizer thread to run the finalizer, the call to the SuppressFinalize method has no effect.
Python deletes unwanted objects (built-in types or class instances) automatically to free the memory space. The process by which Python periodically frees and reclaims blocks of memory that no longer are in use is called Garbage Collection.
Ok, it's known that GC implicitly calls Finalize methods on objects when it identifies that object as garbage.
No no no. That is not known because in order to be knowledge a statement must be true. That statement is false. The garbage collector does not run finalizers as it traces, whether it runs itself or whether you call Collect
. The finalizer thread runs finalizers after the tracing collector has found the garbage and that happens asynchronously with respect to a call to Collect
. (If it happens at all, which it might not, as another answer points out.) That is, you cannot rely on the finalizer thread executing before control returns from Collect
.
Here's an oversimplified sketch of how it works:
As I said, that's oversimplified; the exact details of how the finalizer queue works are a bit more complicated than that. But it gets enough of the idea across. The practical upshot here is that you cannot assume that calling Collect
also runs finalizers, because it doesn't. Let me repeat that one more time: the tracing portion of the garbage collector does not run finalizers, and Collect
only runs the tracing part of the collection mechanism.
Call the aptly named WaitForPendingFinalizers
after calling Collect
if you want to guarantee that all finalizers have run. That will pause the current thread until the finalizer thread gets around to emptying the queue. And if you want to ensure that those finalized objects have their memory reclaimed then you're going to have to call Collect
a second time.
And of course, it goes without saying that you should only be doing this for debugging and testing purposes. Never do this nonsense in production code without a really, really good reason.
Actually the answer "It depends". Actually there is a dedicated thread that executes all finalizers. That means that call to GC.Collect
only triggered this process and execution of all finalizers would be called asynchronously.
If you want to wait till all finalizers would be called you can use following trick:
GC.Collect(); // Waiting till finilizer thread will call all finalizers GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With