I'm having some trouble creating functions with CoffeeScript, I guess I've missed something. For my users controller I'd like to create client-side validation for a signup form. I think I've missed something fundamental with how this all works.
<%= form_for @user, :html => {:onsubmit => "return validate_signup_form();"} do |f| %>
CoffeeScript (assets/users.js.coffee):
validate_signup_form = () ->
alert "Hi"
return false
Expected output:
var validate_signup_form;
validate_signup_form = function() {
alert("Hi");
return false;
};
validate_signup_form();
Real output:
(function() {
var validate_signup_form;
validate_signup_form = function() {
alert("Hi");
return false;
};
}).call(this);
Actually everything works just as it's supposed to. As you can read here, Coffeescript wraps your code in an anonymous function to prevent the pollution of the global namespace. If you just glance at the examples, you might miss this, but the docs clearly state:
Although suppressed within this documentation for clarity, all CoffeeScript output is wrapped in an anonymous function: (function(){ ... })(); This safety wrapper, combined with the automatic generation of the var keyword, make it exceedingly difficult to pollute the global namespace by accident.
In order to access an object, variable or method declared within this artificial scope, you'll need to make it explicitly available within the global scope, e.g. like this:
window.validate_signup_form = validate_signup_form
In the case you're mentioning I'd definitely use events to trigger the method.
Btw.: No need for the empty parenthesis in your method declaration foo =->
works just fine.
polarblau's answer is quite correct. See also:
The closure wrapper is a great way of keeping files modular (as they should be), so I strongly advise against getting rid of it. Note that in the outer scope of your modules, this
/@
is going to be window
, so you can make your code work as intended by just adding a single character:
@validate_signup_form = ->
alert "Hi"
false
It's up to you whether you'd prefer to use @
or window.
for defining globals, but the @
style has another advantage: If you reuse your code in a Node.js application, then it'll still work. Those objects will be attached to exports
instead of window
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With