Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Function defined but not used warning in C

Tags:

c

warnings

I have a number of C source files(both .c and .h files). header files contains a number of functions. Out of those functions, only partially are used in a source .C file.Suppose a.h,b.h are header files and a.c and b.c are .c files. a.h is included in a.c. But only a number of functions those are in a. h are used and rest are not used. After compilation I find following warnings:

 function XXXX defined but not used. 

But those XXXX functions which are not used in a.c are used in b.c. So, i can't completely remove those functions too. So , i decided to make a separate file containing only those XXXX functions and included it wherever it is used.Doing this is creating multiple number of header files. Can anybody please suggest me to some effective way to solve this problem.

like image 765
thetna Avatar asked May 16 '10 22:05

thetna


People also ask

What is static function in C?

Static functions in C are functions that are restricted to the same file in which they are defined. The functions in C are by default global. If we want to limit the scope of the function, we use the keyword static before the function.

Is static but used in inline function?

Static local variables are not allowed to be defined within the body of an inline function. C++ functions implemented inside of a class declaration are automatically defined inline.


2 Answers

"Function defined but not used" warning is only issued for functions with internal linkage, i.e. functions that are declared as static. These functions are only accessible in one translation unit, so the compiler always knows whether they are used (in the program) or not. If you don't reference these functions in their translation unit, these functions are known to be unused, and the warning is generated.

You are saying that these functions "are not used in a.c, but used in b.c". This is not true. When you declare (and define) a function as static in the header file, each translation unit that includes that header file gets its own internal copy of the function. Even though these functions look absolutely the same, they are still separate, completely independent functions. The fact that they have the same name and consist of the same code means nothing to the compiler. So, in b.c you got a completely independent copy of the function, which is used (as you say), but the completely independent copy in a.c is still not used.

The question in this case is why you are doing this. Why on Earth are you defining static functions in the header file? If you really need to do this (i.e. if you really want to spawn a separate internal "clone" of this function in each translation unit), you can work around the warning by using some compiler-specific means. Like in GCC, for example, you can declare the function with __attribute__((unused)) an the warning for this function will no longer be issued.

But normally one wouldn't need to define functions in the header file. Normally one'd use a function with external linkage (i.e. no static), define it in one of the .c files and put the declaration (prototype) in the header file. The compiler will not issue any warnings in this case, even if the function is declared but not used in some translation unit.

like image 170
AnT Avatar answered Sep 25 '22 19:09

AnT


If you just want to hide the warning, use:

-Wno-unused-function 

However, you should probably follow the advice in caf's answer instead. It sounds like you may have defined a function when you only meant to add its declaration.

like image 31
thomasrutter Avatar answered Sep 25 '22 19:09

thomasrutter