I am making a script for choices about a product (colors etc), which works in every browser except for Internet Explorer (11) & Edge.
I put the choices of each parameter in a array and apply a function to them with the array.forEach()
method.
Example for the color parameter:
var color_btns = document.querySelectorAll('#color > p');
color_btns.forEach(function(color) {
color.onclick = function () {
color_btns.forEach(function(element) {
if (element.classList.contains('selected')) {
element.classList.remove('selected');
}
});
color.classList.add('selected');
document.querySelector('#f_color').value = color.dataset.id;
};
});
I get the following output in the console of both IE & Edge:
Object doesn't support property or method 'forEach'
After searching about the issue, I learnt that this function should be supported by IE 9 and newer. I tried to define the function by myself without success. When I log the function it is defined as a function (with "[native code]
" inside).
I replaced every .forEach
by a for
and it's working pretty well,
forEach()
for Internet Explorer & Edge ?I thought it was Array.prototype.forEach
and that recent versions of IE (and all versions of Edge) had it...?
Since nodeList selected by querySelectorAll has an array-like structure so you can directly apply forEach method with it and pass element as the first element in the callback function.
The "querySelectorAll is not a function" error occurs for multiple reasons: calling the method on an object that is not a valid DOM element or the document object. placing the JS script tag above the code that declares the DOM elements. misspelling the querySelectorAll method (it's case sensitive).
forEach() The forEach() method of the NodeList interface calls the callback given in parameter once for each value pair in the list, in insertion order.
querySelectorAll works fine in IE9. It even works in IE8.
The querySelectorAll method selects all matching element from a document specified by a CSS selector, whereas the forEach method is the advanced way to loop through the array elements. In this section, we selected the DOM element using querySelectorAll and looped it using the forEach method.
Since nodeList selected by querySelectorAll has an array-like structure so you can directly apply forEach method with it and pass element as the first element in the callback function. In the previous example, you have looped through all the elements and alerted a message, but in a real-world we have to do something with the selected elements.
By simply avoiding looping directly over the return value of the querySelectorAll () method. This is a screen shot of the result on Chrome DevTools console: Another alternative is to use Array.from () method to convert the NodeList object to a JavaScript Array but it's only available on modern browsers.
querySelectorAllreturns a static NodeList(a snapshot of matching elements as of when you call it). getElementsByTagName, getElementsByTagNameNS, getElementsByClassName, and the childrenproperty on a ParentNode(Elements are parent nodes) return liveHTMLCollectioninstances (if you change the DOM, that change is reflected live in the collection).
Most DOM methods and collection properties aren't actually arrays, they're collections:
querySelectorAll
returns a static NodeList
(a snapshot of matching elements as of when you call it).getElementsByTagName
, getElementsByTagNameNS
, getElementsByClassName
, and the children
property on a ParentNode
(Elements are parent nodes) return live HTMLCollection
instances (if you change the DOM, that change is reflected live in the collection).getElementsByName
returns a live NodeList
(not a snapshot).NodeList
only recently got forEach
(and keys
and a couple of other array methods). HTMLCollection
didn't and won't; it turned out adding them would break too much code on the web.
Both NodeList
and HTMLCollection
are iterable, though, meaning that you can loop through them with for-of
, expand them into an array via spread ([...theCollection]
), etc. But if you're running on a browser where NodeList
doesn't have forEach
, it's probably too old to have any ES2015+ features like for-of
or iteration.
Since NodeList
is specified to have forEach
, you can safely polyfill it, and it's really easy to do:
if (typeof NodeList !== "undefined" && NodeList.prototype && !NodeList.prototype.forEach) {
// Yes, there's really no need for `Object.defineProperty` here
NodeList.prototype.forEach = Array.prototype.forEach;
}
Direct assignment is fine in this case, because enumerable
, configurable
, and writable
should all be true
and it's a value property. (enumerable
being true
surprised me, but that's how it's defined natively on Chrome/Chromium/Edge/Etc., Firefox, the old Legacy Edge, and Safari).
In your own code, you can do that with HTMLCollection
as well if you want, just beware that if you're using some old DOM libs like MooTools or YUI or some such, they may be confused if you add forEach
to HTMLCollection
.
As I said before, NodeList
and HTMLCollection
are both specified to be iterable (because of this Web IDL rule¹). If you run into a browser that has ES2015+ features but doesn't make the collections iterable for some reason, you can polyfill that, too:
if (typeof Symbol !== "undefined" && Symbol.iterator && typeof NodeList !== "undefined" && NodeList.prototype && !NodeList.prototype[Symbol.iterator]) {
Object.defineProperty(NodeList.prototype, Symbol.iterator, {
value: Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator],
writable: true,
configurable: true
});
}
(And the same for HTMLCollection
.)
Here's a live example using both, try this on (for instance) IE11 (although it will only demonstrate forEach
), on which NodeList
doesn't have these features natively:
// Using only ES5 features so this runs on IE11
function log() {
if (typeof console !== "undefined" && console.log) {
console.log.apply(console, arguments);
}
}
if (typeof NodeList !== "undefined" && NodeList.prototype) {
// forEach
if (!NodeList.prototype.forEach) {
// Yes, there's really no need for `Object.defineProperty` here
console.log("Added forEach");
NodeList.prototype.forEach = Array.prototype.forEach;
}
// Iterability - won't happen on IE11 because it doesn't have Symbol
if (typeof Symbol !== "undefined" && Symbol.iterator && !NodeList.prototype[Symbol.iterator]) {
console.log("Added Symbol.iterator");
Object.defineProperty(NodeList.prototype, Symbol.iterator, {
value: Array.prototype[Symbol.iterator],
writable: true,
configurable: true
});
}
}
log("Testing forEach");
document.querySelectorAll(".container div").forEach(function(div) {
var html = div.innerHTML;
div.innerHTML = html[0].toUpperCase() + html.substring(1).toLowerCase();
});
// Iterable
if (typeof Symbol !== "undefined" && Symbol.iterator) {
// Using eval here to avoid causing syntax errors on IE11
log("Testing iterability");
eval(
'for (const div of document.querySelectorAll(".container div")) { ' +
' div.style.color = "blue"; ' +
'}'
);
}
<div class="container">
<div>one</div>
<div>two</div>
<div>three</div>
<div>four</div>
</div>
¹ It's confusing, because HTMLCollection
is iterable but it isn't marked with the iterable
declaration, which bizarrely in the JavaScript DOM bindings doesn't mean that something is iterable, it means that it has forEach
, entries
, keys
, values
, and it's iterable. But HTMLCollection
, which isn't marked with the iterable
declaration, is still iterable. Instead, it's iterable because of this Web IDL rule as mentioned earlier.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With