I'm collecting a count of the shortest paths that floyd warshall finds. For this particular graph the shortest path for 1 -> 3 is 5, and there are two paths with this weight: 1->4->2->3, and 1->4->3.
I wasn't sure the best way to display the graph, so I'm going to use a matrix, please feel free to suggest another way if you know of a better alternative.
//i = infinity, no path exists initially
//for u==v, 0
1 2 3 4
1| 0 i 8 2
2| i 0 2 i
3| i 7 0 6
4| i 1 3 0
So when I run my code, I'm getting the count of shortest paths from 1 -> 3 as just 1, but there are most certainly 2 ways as I mentioned before.
Here is the implementation of the algorithm:
//count[][] is initialized with a 0 if no path between [u][v], and 1 at [u][v] if there is a weight at [u][v].
for (int k = 1; k <= N; k++){
for (int i = 1; i <= N; i++){
for (int j = 1; j <= N; j++){
if (dist[i][j] > dist[i][k] + dist[k][j]){
dist[i][j] = dist[i][k] + dist[k][j];
counts[i][j] = 1;
}
else if (dist[i][j] == dist[i][k] + dist[k][j] && k != i && k != j){
counts[i][j] ++;
}
}
}
}
I basically copy/pasted the code from the wikipedia page and modified to keep the count.
Update: I should mention that I am getting the correct shortest length for all vertices, and for all of them I'm getting the correct count except for [1][3].
Printout of full output:
// Shortest paths // counts
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
1 0 3 5 2 1 1 1 1 1
2 i 0 2 8 2 0 1 1 1
3 i 7 0 6 3 0 2 1 1
4 i 1 3 0 4 0 1 2 1
Update: Stepping through the code line by line, we find a shortest path from 1->3 of weight 5 when k = 4, i = 1, j = 3.
Update: Reading the wikipedia entry for the Floyd-Warshall algorithm, I've gathered that when k = 4, we are checking for paths going through the vertices {1, 2, 3, 4}. However, in every iteration of k we will only look at [1][3] only once. I think maybe this is the problem.
If you are using a two dimensional int array to store your data, it would be best to change your double loop to run from 0 to N-1 to avoid any potential errors. I did that and the results are correct (shortest distance from 1->3 is 5). Here is the updated code and printout:
//count[][] is initialized with a 0 if no path between [u][v], and 1 at [u][v] if there is a weight at [u][v].
int N = 4;
int max = 1000000;
int[][] dist = new int[N][N];
int[][] counts = new int[N][N];
dist[0][0] = 0; dist[0][1] = max; dist[0][2] = 8; dist[0][3] = 2;
dist[1][0] = max; dist[1][1] = 0; dist[1][2] = 2; dist[1][3] = max;
dist[2][0] = max; dist[2][1] = 7; dist[2][2] = 0; dist[2][3] = 6;
dist[3][0] = max; dist[3][1] = 1; dist[3][2] = 3; dist[3][3] = 0;
//initialize counts
for (int i=0; i<N; i++){
for (int j=0; j<N; j++){
if (dist[i][j]<max){
counts[i][j]=1;
}
}
}
for (int k = 0; k < N; k++){
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++){
for (int j = 0; j < N; j++){
if (dist[i][j] > dist[i][k] + dist[k][j]){
dist[i][j] = dist[i][k] + dist[k][j];
counts[i][j] = 1;
}
else if (dist[i][j] == dist[i][k] + dist[k][j] && k != i && k != j){
counts[i][j] ++;
}
}
}
}
System.out.println("i 1 2 3 4");
for (int i=0; i<N; i++){
System.out.print(i+1 + ": ");
for (int j=0; j<N; j++){
System.out.print(dist[i][j]>=max ? "i ":dist[i][j] + " ");
}
System.out.println();
}
System.out.println();
System.out.println("i 1 2 3 4");
for (int i=0; i<N; i++){
System.out.print(i+1 + ": ");
for (int j=0; j<N; j++){
System.out.print(counts[i][j] + " ");
}
System.out.println();
}
Printout: i 1 2 3 4 1: 0 3 5 2 2: i 0 2 8 3: i 7 0 6 4: i 1 3 0
i 1 2 3 4 1: 1 1 1 1 2: 0 1 1 1 3: 0 2 1 1 4: 0 1 2 1
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With