I have been unable to determine why flexbox is not working in IE 11.
For testing, I sourced a very simple flexbox layout from CodePen and have pasted the information below.
Chrome works as intended; IE11 fails.
Image of layout-success running on Chrome:
Image of layout-failure on IE11
body { background: #333; font-family: helvetica; font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.7rem; } ul { list-style: none; } li { background: hotpink; height: 200px; text-align: center; border: 2px solid seashell; color: seashell; margin: 10px; flex: auto; min-width: 120px; max-width: 180px; } .flex { display: flex; justify-content: flex-start; flex-wrap: wrap; }
<ul class="flex"> <li>1</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5</li> <li>6</li> <li>7</li> <li>8</li> <li>9</li> <li>10</li> </ul>
http://codepen.io/hankthewhale/pen/IdKkB?editors=110
Internet Explorer doesn't fully support Flexbox due to: Partial support is due to large amount of bugs present (see known issues).
Safari versions 9 and up support the current flexbox spec without prefixes. Older Safari versions, however, require -webkit- prefixes. Sometimes min-width and max-width cause alignment problems which can be resolved with flex equivalents.
The align-content property is used to align the flex lines.
IE has a problem parsing the flex
property.
Here are a few workarounds that have worked for me:
Use the long-hand properties instead of the shorthand.
Instead of something like this: flex: 0 0 35%
.
Try this:
flex-grow: 0
flex-shrink: 0
flex-basis: 35%
Make sure flex-shrink
is enabled.
So instead of this: flex: 0 0 35%
Try this: flex: 0 1 35%
(In other cases flex-shrink
needs to be disabled: Flex item overlaps another item in IE11)
Careful with percentage and unitless values with flex-basis
This may depend on your version of IE11. Behavior appears to vary.
Try these variations:
flex: 1 1 0
flex: 1 1 0px
flex: 1 1 0%
Beware! Certain css minifiers will replace 0px
with 0
, which can be a really annoying thing to debug (however, they won't change 0%
for some reason).
More details here:
Instead of flex: 1
use flex: auto
(or add in flex-basis: auto
)
If you're using flex: 1
in flex-direction: row
(such as on larger screens), and you switch to flex-direction: column
in a media query (let's say for mobile devices), you may find that your flex items collapse.
In your media query, add flex-basis: auto
. This will override the flex-basis
value in the flex: 1
rule (which is usually 0
, 0px
or 0%
, depending on the browser).
Using flex: auto
should also work, which is short for:
flex-grow: 1
flex-shrink: 1
flex-basis: auto
width
/ height
properties instead of flex
.Use block
layout instead of flex
layout.
You don't need to completely abandon flex layout. But for a particular container you may be able to get the job done with display: block
instead of display: flex; flex-direction: column
.
For example, in needing to use the padding trick to responsively embed a video in a flex item, the obstacle I faced was that some browsers don't work well with percentage padding (or margin) in a flex container.
To make it work I switched the display
value on the flex item from this:
/* a flex item, also a nested flex container */ #footer-container > article { display: flex; flex-direction: column; }
to this:
#footer-container > article { display: block; }
For me, using
flex: 1 1 auto;
instead of
flex: 1;
solved the flex issue on IE 11.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With