In C# what is the shortest code to flatten an array?
For example, I want
[[1,2],[2,3],[4,5]]
into the array
[1,2,3,4,5]
I am looking for the shortest way to do so.
To flatten an array means to reduce the dimensionality of an array. In simpler terms, it means reducing a multidimensional array to a specific dimension. There are certain situations in which the elements of an array are an array, generally referred to as nested arrays.
Prototype - flatten() Method This method returns a flat (one-dimensional) version of the array. Nested arrays are recursively injected inline. This can prove very useful when handling the results of a recursive collection algorithm.
2D Vector can be flattened using iterators. Store starting and ending iterator of every vector in two arrays, iStart & iEnd respectively. Create a hasNext() method to check if it has the vector has next element or not. Print the current element, if hasNext() yields true.
Maybe I'm reading "shortest code" the wrong way, but I would propose using LINQ SelectMany
and Distinct
:
var values = new[]
{
new[] { 1, 2 },
new[] { 2, 3 },
new[] { 4, 5 },
};
var flattenedUniqueValues = values.SelectMany(x => x).Distinct();
Converting a staggered array to a 1-dimensional array is simple and can be done in O(n)
time and n
space (where n
is the sum of 2nd-dimension array lengths), however in your example you seem to remove duplicate values - that is not flattening an array, but it can still be done in O(n)
time but will require O(2n)
space because you need a hashtable for O(1)
duplicate value lookups.
A possible problem exists in knowing in advance how many elements will exist in the final array. A straightforward solution is to append to a List<T>
and calling .ToArray()
at the end, but that will result in O(2n)
time and O(3n)
space (but potentially more owing to List<T>
internal reallocations):
Int32[][] jagged = ...
HashSet<Int32> seen = new HashSet<Int32>();
List<Int32> ret = new List<Int32>();
for(int i = 0; i < jagged.Length; i++) {
for(int j = 0; j < jagged[i].Length; j++) {
Int32 val = jagged[i][j];
if( !seen.Contains( val ) ) {
ret.Add( val );
seen.Add( val );
}
}
}
return ret.ToArray(); // This takes O(n) time and will allocate O(n) additional space.
Another solution exists by doing 2 passes yourself: the first to determine the size of the output, then the second pass to generate it - which will result in less copying: exactly O(2n)
time and exactly O(2n)
space:
Int32[][] jagged = ...
HashSet<Int32> seen = new HashSet<Int32>();
// Pass 1
for(int i = 0; i < jagged.Length; i++) {
for(int j = 0; j < jagged[i].Length; j++) {
Int32 val = jagged[i][j];
seen.Add( val ); // HashSet.Add is safe/idempotent
}
}
Int32[] ret = new Int32[ seen.Count ];
// Pass 2
seen.Clear();
Int32 retIdx = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < jagged.Length; i++) {
for(int j = 0; j < jagged[i].Length; j++) {
Int32 val = jagged[i][j];
if( !seen.Contains( val ) ) {
ret[++retIdx] = val;
seen.Add( val );
}
}
}
return ret;
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With