Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Finding JavaScript memory leaks with Chrome

People also ask

How do I track JavaScript execution in Chrome?

One simple approach is to start Chrome Developer Tools, switch to the Sources panel and hit F8 (Pause Execution). This will break on the first executed JavaScript statement.

Does Chrome have memory leaks?

Google Chrome is one of the popular web browsers and Chrome memory leak is one of the common issues. Today we will talk about this problem on the MiniTool website. If you find there are many tabs of Chrome in Task Manager and Chrome uses much memory, follow these solutions below to easily fix the issue.

How do I run a memory profiling in Chrome?

To begin using the allocation profiler: Make sure you have the latest Chrome Canary. Open the Developer Tools and click on the gear icon in the lower right. Now, open the Profiler panel, you should see a profile called "Record Heap Allocations"


A good workflow to find memory leaks is the three snapshot technique, first used by Loreena Lee and the Gmail team to solve some of their memory problems. The steps are, in general:

  • Take a heap snapshot.
  • Do stuff.
  • Take another heap snapshot.
  • Repeat the same stuff.
  • Take another heap snapshot.
  • Filter objects allocated between Snapshots 1 and 2 in Snapshot 3's "Summary" view.

For your example, I have adapted the code to show this process (you can find it here) delaying the creation of the Backbone View until the click event of the Start button. Now:

  • Run the HTML (saved locally of using this address) and take a snapshot.
  • Click Start to create the view.
  • Take another snapshot.
  • Click remove.
  • Take another snapshot.
  • Filter objects allocated between Snapshots 1 and 2 in Snapshot 3's "Summary" view.

Now you are ready to find memory leaks!

You will notice nodes of a few different colors. Red nodes do not have direct references from Javascript to them, but are alive because they are part of a detached DOM tree. There may be a node in the tree referenced from Javascript (maybe as a closure or variable) but is coincidentally preventing the entire DOM tree from being garbage collected.

enter image description here

Yellow nodes however do have direct references from Javascript. Look for yellow nodes in the same detached DOM tree to locate references from your Javascript. There should be a chain of properties leading from the DOM window to the element.

In your particular you can see a HTML Div element marked as red. If you expand the element you will see that is referenced by a "cache" function.

enter image description here

Select the row and in your console type $0, you will see the actual function and location:

>$0
function cache( key, value ) {
        // Use (key + " ") to avoid collision with native prototype properties (see Issue #157)
        if ( keys.push( key += " " ) > Expr.cacheLength ) {
            // Only keep the most recent entries
            delete cache[ keys.shift() ];
        }
        return (cache[ key ] = value);
    }                                                     jquery-2.0.2.js:1166

This is where your element is being referenced. Unfortunally there is not much you can do, it is a internal mechanism from jQuery. But, just for testing purpose, go the function and change the method to:

function cache( key, value ) {
    return value;
}

Now if you repeat the process you will not see any red node :)

Documentation:

  • Eliminating memory leaks in Gmail.
  • Easing JavaScript Memory Profiling In Chrome DevTools.

Here's a tip on memory profiling of a jsfiddle: Use the following URL to isolate your jsfiddle result, it removes all of the jsfiddle framework and loads only your result.

http://jsfiddle.net/4QhR2/show/

I was never able to figure out how to use the Timeline and Profiler to track down memory leaks, until I read the following documentation. After reading the section entitled 'Object allocation tracker' I was able to use the 'Record Heap Allocations' tool, and track some some Detached DOM nodes.

I fixed the problem by switching from jQuery event binding, to using Backbone event delegation. It's my understanding that newer versions of Backbone will automatically unbind the events for you if you call View.remove(). Execute some of the demos yourself, they are set up with memory leaks for you to identify. Feel free to ask questions here if you still don't get it after studying this documentation.

https://developers.google.com/chrome-developer-tools/docs/javascript-memory-profiling


Basically you need to look at the number of objects inside your heap snapshot. If the number of objects increases between two snapshots and you've disposed of objects then you have a memory leak. My advice is to look for event handlers in your code which do not get detached.


There is an introduction video from Google, which will be very helpful to find JavaScript memory leaks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3ugr9BJqIs


You could also look at the Timeline tab in developer tools. Record the usage of your app and keep an eye on the DOM Node and Event listener count.

If the memory graph would indeed indicate a memory leak, then you can use the profiler to figure out what is leaking.


You also might want to read :

http://addyosmani.com/blog/taming-the-unicorn-easing-javascript-memory-profiling-in-devtools/

It explains the use of the chrome developer tools and gives some step-by-step advices on how to confirm and locate a memory leak using heap snapshot comparison and the different hep snapshot views available.


I second the advice to take a heap snapshot, they're excellent for detecting memory leaks, chrome does an excellent job of snapshotting.

In my research project for my degree I was building an interactive web application that had to generate a lot of data built up in 'layers', many of these layers would be 'deleted' in the UI but for some reason the memory wasn't being deallocated, using the snapshot tool I was able to determine that JQuery had been keeping a reference on the object (the source was when I was trying to trigger a .load() event which kept the reference despite going out of scope). Having this information at hand single-handedly saved my project, it's a highly useful tool when you're using other people's libraries and you have this issue of lingering references stopping the GC from doing its job.

EDIT: It's also useful to plan ahead what actions you're going to perform to minimize time spent snapshotting, hypothesize what could be causing the problem and test each scenario out, making snapshots before and after.