I'm new to rails. Just wondering which is the better approach that will return nil if the subject_id can't be found:
@subject = Subject.find_by_id(params[:subject_id])
or
@subject = Subject.where(:id => params[:subject_id]).first
Thanks.
I prefer find_by
as the name is descriptive and you get the object with out having to call a second function (i.e. first
)
User.find(9) # returns User object. Throws exception when not found.
User.find_by(id: 9) # returns User object. Returns nil when not found.
User.where(id: 9).first # returns User object. Returns nil when not found.
They both generate the same SQL statement:
1.9.3p194 :003 > Example.find_by_id(9)
Example Load (0.3ms) SELECT "examples".* FROM "examples" WHERE "examples"."id" = 9 LIMIT 1
nil
1.9.3p194 :004 > Example.where(:id => 9).first
Example Load (0.3ms) SELECT "examples".* FROM "examples" WHERE "examples"."id" = 9 LIMIT 1
nil
So they'll have the same performance characteristics at the database. There may be a slight difference in the Rails code for find_by_*_
vs. where
, but I'd imagine that will be negligible compared to query time.
Edit: In light of Ryan Bigg's comment below, I'd have to suggest the second form for forward compatibility.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With