I've been trying to solve a simple quiz question to find all the possible permutation of a string using Ruby and recursion.
I have the following Ruby code:
def permutation(string)
return [string] if string.size < 2
chr = string.chars.first
perms = permutation(string[1..-1])
result = []
for perm in perms
for i in (0..perm.size)
result << (perm[0..i] + chr + perm[i..-1])
end
end
return result
end
Whenever I try to test the code with puts permutation("abc") I get the following output:
cacbc
cbabc
cbcac
cbca
cacb
cbab
cba
Theoretically speaking it's supposed to be a very simple and straightforward problem, but I'm sure I'm doing something wrong. Most probably it's something with the ranges of the loops. And I know that Ruby Array class has instance method permutation to do that but I'm trying to solve it for practising.
Please note that the complexity is O(N!) for the current implementation. Is there anyway to enhance the performance further?
To see what the difficulty may be, let's try it with an even simpler example:
string = "ab"
Your desired result is ["ab", "ba"]
. Let's see what you get:
string.size #=> 2
so we don't return when
return [string] if string.size < 2
#=> return ["ab"] if "ab".size < 2
is executed.
Next we calculate:
chr = string.chars.first #=> "a"
Notice that a more direct way of making this calculation is as follows:
chr = string[0] #=> "a"
or, better, using String#chr,
chr = string.chr #=> "a"
The latter illustrates why chr
is not the best choice for the variable name.
Next
perms = permutation(string[1..-1])
#=> = permutation("b")
I will now indent the return values to emphasize that we are calling permutation
a second time. permuation
's argument is:
string #=> "b"
Now when we execute:
return [string] if string.size < 2
#=> return ["b"] if "b".size < 2
we return ["b"]
, so (back to original call to permutation
):
perms = ["b"]
to go with chr => "a"
, calculated earlier. Next:
result = []
for perm in perms
for i in (0..perm.size)
result << (perm[0..i] + chr + perm[i..-1])
end
end
As perms
contains only the single element "b"
, the two for
loops simplify to:
for i in (0.."b".size)
result << ("b"[0..i] + "a" + "b"[i..-1])
end
which is:
for i in (0..1)
result << ("b"[0..i] + "a" + "b"[i..-1])
end
Notice that "b"[0..0]
, "b"[0..1]
and "b"[0..-1]
all equal "b"[0]
, which is just "b"
, and "b"[1..-1] #=> ''
. Therefore, when i => 0
, we execute:
result << ("b"[0..0] + "a" + "b"[0..-1])
#=> result << ("b" + "a" + "b")
#=> result << "bab"
and when i => 1
:
result << ("b"[0..1] + "a" + "b"[1..-1])
#=> result << ("b" + "a" + "")
#=> result << "ba"
so:
result => ["bab" + "ba"]
which clearly is not what you want.
What you need to do is is change the double for
loops to:
for perm in perms
result << chr + perm
for i in (1..perm.size-1)
result << (perm[0..i-1] + chr + perm[i..-1])
end
result << perm + chr
end
which could be written more compactly by employing the method String#insert:
for perm in perms
for i in (0..perm.size)
result << perm.dup.insert(i,chr)
end
end
which you would normally see written like this:
perms.each_with_object([]) do |perm, result|
(0..perm.size).each { |i| result << perm.dup.insert(i,chr) }
end
Notice that we have to .dup
the string before sending insert
, as insert
modifies the string.
Doing it like this, you don't need result = []
. Neither do you need return result
, as parms.each_with_object
returns result
and if there is no return
statement, the method returns the last quantity calculated. Also, you don't need the temporary variable perms
(or ch
, if desired).
Putting this altogether, we have:
def permutation(string)
return [string] if string.size < 2
ch = string[0]
permutation(string[1..-1]).each_with_object([]) do |perm, result|
(0..perm.size).each { |i| result << perm.dup.insert(i,ch) }
end
end
Let's try it:
permutation("ab")
#=> ["ab", "ba"]
permutation("abc")
#=> ["abc", "bac", "bca", "acb", "cab", "cba"]
permutation("abcd")
#=> ["abcd", "bacd", "bcad", "bcda", "acbd", "cabd",
# "cbad", "cbda", "acdb", "cadb", "cdab", "cdba",
# "abdc", "badc", "bdac", "bdca", "adbc", "dabc",
# "dbac", "dbca", "adcb", "dacb", "dcab", "dcba"]
Eki, which one are you in the picture?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With