Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Fastest stdin/out IO in python 3?

Tags:

I've been solving a few problems on SPOJ.pl using python 3.1.2 and some peoples fast result on simple problems makes me wonder if there is a faster way to handle input and output.

I've tried using

input() print() 

and

sys.stdin.readline() sys.stdout.write() 

or rather

for line in sys.stdin:     #Handle input     sys.stdout.write(output) 

to process each line. I've also tried to collect all output in lists and print all at once when everything is processed.

But all of these produce similar execution times.

Is there any faster way to handle input and output from stdin/out?

like image 792
while Avatar asked Nov 02 '11 14:11

while


People also ask

Is Stdin faster than input?

stdin. readline() is the fastest one when reading strings and input() when reading integers.

How do you reduce input time in Python?

you could use threading. Timer instead of Thread + time. sleep . There is no raw_input in Python 3.

What is the stdin in Python?

Python sys module stdin is used by the interpreter for standard input. Internally, it calls the input() function. The input string is appended with a newline character (\n) in the end. So, you can use the rstrip() function to remove it.


2 Answers

The following will probably be fastest:

  1. Read all the input at once using os.read(0, some_big_enough_number).

  2. Process the output, collecting the results in a list results.

  3. Write all the output at once using os.write(1, "".join(results)).

I remember one case where I noticed that os.read() and os.write() are sometimes faster than using Python I/O, but I don't remember the details.

like image 188
Sven Marnach Avatar answered Oct 29 '22 14:10

Sven Marnach


SPOJ lets you choose among a variety of programming languages. Are you comparing your execution time to other solutions written in other programming languages?

Just for fun, I submitted the following solutions to the first problem (codename TEST) to compare run-times.

C++ solution (G++ 4.3.2)

#include <iostream> int main ( int, char** ) {      for ( int number=0; (std::cin >> number) && (number != 42); ) {          std::cout << number << std::endl;      } } 

See the submission.

Python (2.5) solution

import sys for line in sys.stdin:     number = int(line)     if number == 42:         break     print number 

See the submission.

Conclusion

I'm not 100% sure that this gets the absolute best performance in either languages, but there's not so much code in there to optimize.

I get time 0.00 measurement for the C++ and 0.04 measurement for the Python code. Assuming the sequence of numbers submitted to both programs is the same, I think comparison of run-times against solutions in other languages is almost meaningless (see next paragraph).

Now, this is only true for simple problems. Most advanced problems require choosing the right algorithm for the problem and choosing the wrong one has drastic consequences. In those cases, carefully crafted Python solutions might still be slower than carefully crafted C++ solutions but the good Python solution will beat a naïve solution written in any other language.

like image 45
André Caron Avatar answered Oct 29 '22 14:10

André Caron