My apologies for the dumb question...but I can't seem to find a simple solution
I want to extract the standardized coefficients from a fitted linear model (in R) there must be a simple way or function that does that. can you tell me what is it?
EDIT (following some of the comments below): I should have probably provided more contextual information about my question. I was teaching an introductory R workshop for a bunch of psychologists. For them, a linear model without the ability to get standardized coefficients is as if you didn't run the model at all (ok, this is a bit of an exaggeration, but you get the point). When we've done some regressions this was their first question, which (my bad) I didn't anticipate (I'm not a psychologist). Of course I can program this myself, and of course I can look for packages that do it for me. But at the same time, I do think that this is kind of a basic and common required feature of linear models, that on the spot, I thought there should be a basic function that does it without a need to install more and more packages (which is perceived as a difficulty for beginners). So I asked (and this was also an opportunity to show them how to get help when they need it).
My apologies for those who think I asked a stupid question, and my many thanks for those who took the time to answer it.
The standardized coefficient is found by multiplying the unstandardized coefficient by the ratio of the standard deviations of the independent variable (here, x1) and dependent variable.
Summary: R linear regression uses the lm() function to create a regression model given some formula, in the form of Y~X+X2. To look at the model, you use the summary() function. To analyze the residuals, you pull out the $resid variable from your new model.
Package lm. beta standardizes the coefficients after estimating them using the standard deviations or similar measures of the used variables.
There is a convenience function in the QuantPsyc
package for that, called lm.beta
. However, I think the easiest way is to just standardize your variables. The coefficients will then automatically be the standardized "beta"-coefficients (i.e. coefficients in terms of standard deviations).
For instance,
lm(scale(your.y) ~ scale(your.x), data=your.Data)
will give you the standardized coefficient.
Are they really the same? The following illustrates that both are identical:
library("QuantPsyc") mod <- lm(weight ~ height, data=women) coef_lmbeta <- lm.beta(mod) coef_lmbeta > height 0.9955 mod2 <- lm(scale(weight) ~ scale(height), data=women) coef_scale <- coef(mod2)[2] coef_scale > scale(height) 0.9955 all.equal(coef_lmbeta, coef_scale, check.attributes=F) [1] TRUE
which shows that both are identical, as they should be.
How to avoid clumsy variable names? In case you don't want to deal with these clumsy variable names such as scale(height)
, one option is to standardize the variables outside the lm
call in the dataset itself. For instance,
women2 <- lapply(women, scale) # standardizes all variables mod3 <- lm(weight ~ height, data=women2) coef_alt <- coef(mod3)[2] coef_alt > height 0.9955 all.equal(coef_lmbeta, coef_alt) [1] TRUE
How do I standardize multiple variables conveniently? In the likely event that you don't want to standardize all variables in your dataset, you could pick out all that occur in your formula. For instance, referring to the mtcars
-dataset now (since women
only contains height
and weight
):
Say the following is the regression model I want to estimate:
modelformula <- mpg ~ cyl + disp + hp + drat + qsec
We can use the fact that all.vars
gives me a vector of the variable names.
all.vars(modelformula) [1] "mpg" "cyl" "disp" "hp" "drat" "qsec"
We can use this to subset the dataset accordingly. For instance,
mycars <- lapply(mtcars[, all.vars(modelformula)], scale)
will give me a dataset in which all variables have been standardized. Linear regressions using mycars
will now give standardized betas. Please make sure that standardizing all these variables makes sense, though!
Potential issue with only one variable: In case you model formula only contains one explanatory variable and you are working with the built-in dataframes (and not with tibbles), the following adjustment is advisable (credits go to @JerryT in the comments):
mycars <- lapply(mtcars[, all.vars(modelformula), drop=F], scale)
This is because when you extract only one column from a standard data frame, R retuns a vector instead of a dataframe. drop=F
will prevent this from happening. This also won't be a problem if e.g. tibbles
are used. See e.g.
class(mtcars[, "mpg"]) [1] "numeric" class(mtcars[, "mpg", drop=F]) [1] "data.frame" library(tidyverse) class(as.tibble(mtcars)[, "mpg"]) [1] "tbl_df" "tbl" "data.frame"
Another issue with missing values in the dataframe (credits go again to @JerryT in the comments): By default, R's lm
removes all rows where at least one column is missing. scale
, on the other hand, would take all values that are non-missing, even if an observation has a missing value in a different column. If you want to mimick the action of lm
, you may want to first drop all rows with missing values, like so:
all_complete <- complete.cases(df) df[all_complete,]
Package lm.beta
has several functions to work with standardised coefficients, including lm.beta()
which requires an lm
object:
res <- lm(y~x) lm.beta(res)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With