I'm looking for a way to optimize my code.
I have entry data in this form:
import pandas as pn
a=[{'Feature1': 'aa1','Feature2': 'bb1','Feature3': 'cc2' },
{'Feature1': 'aa2','Feature2': 'bb2' },
{'Feature1': 'aa1','Feature2': 'cc1' }
]
b=['num1','num2','num3']
df= pn.DataFrame({'num':b, 'dic':a })
I would like to extract element 'Feature3' from dictionaries in column 'dic'(if exist) in above data frame. So far I was able to solve it but I don't know if this is the fastest way, it seems to be a little bit over complicated.
Feature3=[]
for idx, row in df['dic'].iteritems():
l=row.keys()
if 'Feature3' in l:
Feature3.append(row['Feature3'])
else:
Feature3.append(None)
df['Feature3']=Feature3
print df
Is there a better/faster/simpler way do extract this Feature3 to separate column in the dataframe?
Thank you in advance for help.
You can convert a dictionary to Pandas Dataframe using df = pd. DataFrame. from_dict(my_dict) statement.
The keys of the dictionary are the DataFrame's column labels, and the dictionary values are the data values in the corresponding DataFrame columns. The values can be contained in a tuple, list, one-dimensional NumPy array, Pandas Series object, or one of several other data types.
df['Feature3'] = df['dic'].apply(lambda x: x.get('Feature3'))
Agree with maxymoo. Consider changing the format of your dataframe.
(Sidenote: pandas is generally imported as pd)
You can use a list comprehension to extract feature 3 from each row in your dataframe, returning a list.
feature3 = [d.get('Feature3') for d in df.dic]
If 'Feature3' is not in dic
, it returns None by default.
You don't even need pandas, as you can again use a list comprehension to extract the feature from your original dictionary a
.
feature3 = [d.get('Feature3') for d in a]
If you apply
a Series
, you get a quite nice DataFrame
:
>>> df.dic.apply(pn.Series)
Feature1 Feature2 Feature3
0 aa1 bb1 cc2
1 aa2 bb2 NaN
2 aa1 cc1 NaN
From this point, you can just use regular pandas operations.
I think you can first create new DataFrame
by comprehension
and then create new column like:
df1 = pd.DataFrame([x for x in df['dic']])
print df1
Feature1 Feature2 Feature3
0 aa1 bb1 cc2
1 aa2 bb2 NaN
2 aa1 cc1 NaN
df['Feature3'] = df1['Feature3']
print df
dic num Feature3
0 {u'Feature2': u'bb1', u'Feature3': u'cc2', u'F... num1 cc2
1 {u'Feature2': u'bb2', u'Feature1': u'aa2'} num2 NaN
2 {u'Feature2': u'cc1', u'Feature1': u'aa1'} num3 NaN
Or one line:
df['Feature3'] = pd.DataFrame([x for x in df['dic']])['Feature3']
print df
dic num Feature3
0 {u'Feature2': u'bb1', u'Feature3': u'cc2', u'F... num1 cc2
1 {u'Feature2': u'bb2', u'Feature1': u'aa2'} num2 NaN
2 {u'Feature2': u'cc1', u'Feature1': u'aa1'} num3 NaN
Timings:
len(df) = 3
:
In [24]: %timeit pd.DataFrame([x for x in df['dic']])
The slowest run took 4.63 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached
1000 loops, best of 3: 596 µs per loop
In [25]: %timeit df.dic.apply(pn.Series)
1000 loops, best of 3: 1.43 ms per loop
len(df) = 3000
:
In [27]: %timeit pd.DataFrame([x for x in df['dic']])
100 loops, best of 3: 3.16 ms per loop
In [28]: %timeit df.dic.apply(pn.Series)
1 loops, best of 3: 748 ms per loop
I think you're thinking about the data structures slightly wrong. It's better to create the data frame with the features as columns from the start; pandas is actually smart enough to do this by default:
In [240]: pd.DataFrame(a)
Out[240]:
Feature1 Feature2 Feature3
0 aa1 bb1 cc2
1 aa2 bb2 NaN
2 aa1 cc1 NaN
You would then add on your "num" column in a separate step, since the data is in a different orientation, either with
df['num'] = b
or
df = df.assign(num = b)
(I prefer the second option since it's got a more functional flavour).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With