void main(){
int[3] arr = [1, 2, 3,];
}
Is the extra comma legal or is it not flagged as error because of a compiler bug? I have many mixins that generate arrays with the extra comma at the end. I would like to know if I should taken the time to remove them.
even this compiles without errors:
void main(){
int[3] arr = [1, 2, 3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,];
}
I believe it's legal in order to allow for templates (or even mixins) to work in a generic manner:
template Foo(T) { } //What if Foo is empty like this?
auto arr = [1, 2, Foo!(int), Foo!(long)];
// [1, 2, , ]
It makes templates much easier to work with, so that you don't have to special-case against special outputs.
A more realistic example:
template Iota(size_t start, size_t end) //All integers in range [start, end)
{
static if (start < end)
alias TypeTuple!(start, Iota!(start + 1, end)) Iota;
else
alias TypeTuple!() Iota;
}
auto arr1 = [-10, Iota!(0, 3)]; // arr is now [-10, 0, 1, 2]
auto arr2 = [-10, Iota!(a, b)]; // arr is now [-10, a .. b]
Now what happens if a
is equal to b
? Then arr2
decays to [-10, ]
.
It's allowed in many languages to allow code formatting like:
string[3] arr = [
"Some long String",
"And another",
"etc, etc, etc",
];
without having to omit the comma from the last value.
Java permits such an array initializer too.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With