I'm trying to learn ExtJS and object-oriented JavaScript in general. I've seen people defining classes in custom namespaces in a couple of ways. What's the difference between these two methods?
Method 1
Ext.ns('myapp.cars');
(function(){
var Car = Ext.extend(Object, {
//...
})
myapp.cars.Car = Car;
})()
Method 2
Ext.ns('myapp.cars');
myapp.cars.Car = Ext.extend(Object, {
//...
});
Method 2 is easier to read and requires less code; is there any reason Method 1 is better? Thanks!
As per the syntax of Ext. define, the first parameter 'Student' is class name. The second parameter is a JavaScript object which contains name and getName(), and the third parameter (optional) is callback function which will be called after 'Student' class is created. So this way you can create custom class in Ext JS.
February 17, 2022 | Eli M. Sencha Ext JS is the most comprehensive JavaScript framework for building data-intensive, cross-platform web and mobile applications for any modern device.
Ext. create - to create an instance of a pre-defined class. - the class was defined using Ext. define - used to define the data and behavior of a component. which will be used later.
We can inherit a new class from existing class using extend keyword while defining a new class in Ext JS.
It's basically the same, except that you could use private variables in the self-exectuing function of the first method, while you can only define global variables in the second one.
For example:
Ext.ns('myapp.cars');
(function(){
var carInfo = {
goodEngine: true
};
var Car = Ext.extend(Object, {
info: carInfo
});
myapp.cars.Car = Car;
})()
// carInfo is undefined here, so this will give an error
alert( carInfo.goodEngine );
So, the first method is quite useful if you work with a bunge of variables that you won't use later on.
The following are practically equivalent:
var Car = Ext.extend(Object, {
//...
});
myapp.cars.Car = Car;
... and:
myapp.cars.Car = Ext.extend(Object, {
//...
});
In the first example you'd be using a temporary variable to hold a reference to the newly created object, which is then copied to myapp.cars.Car
(the reference is copied, not the object). In the second example you'd be assigning the reference to the object directly to myapp.cars.Car
.
The reason your first example was enclosed in the self-invoking anonymous function (function(){ })()
is to limit the scope of that temporary variable. That is generally done in order not to pollute the global namespace with that Car
variable. If there was an other Car
variable defined elsewhere, it would not conflict with this one. Example:
var Car = "My Nice Car";
(function(){
var Car = Ext.extend(Object, {
//...
});
myapp.cars.Car = Car;
})();
alert(Car); // Still "My Nice Car"
// No conflict with the `Car` variable in the self invoking function.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With