Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Executing a stored procedure within a function and not waiting for the return

I know somewhere I may have overlooked something, but I am trying to fix an application that I didn't develop and don't usually maintain, so forgive me in advance if I am making a straight forward blunder.

There is currently an issue with this web-app that is causing a timeout when executing a certain function, I've traced it down to one thing, it is executing a stored procedure and expecting the stored procedure to return the # of rows affected, which is all fine and dandy. However, this stored procedure runs a minimum of 50s and is causing a timeout. Also, I don't want the UI to hang for 50s while this happens, it is just updating some status fields in a database based on the information that was changed, what it returns is of no use to the end user, so it just needs to be triggered and forgotten about so that the user can continue to use the application.

I've tried both creating a task and creating a thread and for some reason the function insists on waiting for this to complete.

This is the function that calls the stored procedure:

 public static void UpdateComputerStatusByApplicationID(int ApplicationID)
{
    using (SqlConnection Conn = new SqlConnection(GlobalMethods.CONNECTION_STRING))
    {
        SqlCommand Cmd = new SqlCommand("UpdateComputerStatusByApplicationId", Conn);
        Cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
        Cmd.Parameters.Add("@applicationid", SqlDbType.Int).Value = ApplicationID;

        Conn.Open();
        Cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
        Conn.Close();
    }
}

And the exception is coming from Cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); which is a timeout exception.

This is where I am calling it as a task from the function:

public void UpdateApplication(a_Applications newApplication, XPToWin7 xpToWin7)
    {
        try
        {
            var orginalApplication = GetApplication(newApplication.AutoNumber);
            ObjectContext.ApplyCurrentValues(orginalApplication.EntityKey.EntitySetName, newApplication);

            if (xpToWin7 != null)
            {
                UnlinkXPAppWithWin7App(orginalApplication.AutoNumber);
                LinkXPAppWithWin7App(orginalApplication.AutoNumber, xpToWin7);
            }

            Task UpdateComputerStatus = Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
            {
                DAL.UpdateComputerStatusByApplicationID(orginalApplication.AutoNumber);
            }, TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning);

            SaveChanges();
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            throw new Exception("Exception when updating the application" + ex.Message, ex);
        }
    }

I'm not sure where I've gone wrong or why it isn't working as intended but when this function gets invoked then it just hangs in the UI till it throws an inner exception which is from the cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); .

Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

like image 550
BAllan Avatar asked May 22 '13 16:05

BAllan


People also ask

Can we call procedure inside function?

A function cannot call the procedure inside the program's body.

Does stored procedure execute automatically?

A stored procedure that is set to automatic execution runs every time an instance of SQL Server is started. Blocks the execution of a batch, stored procedure, or transaction until a specified time or time interval is reached, or a specified statement modifies or returns at least one row.

Can we use return in stored procedure?

You can use one or more RETURN statements in a stored procedure. The RETURN statement can be used anywhere after the declaration blocks within the SQL-procedure-body. To return multiple output values, parameters can be used instead. Parameter values must be set prior to the RETURN statement being executed.

Are SQL stored procedure asynchronous?

When Microsoft SQL Server jobs are started from a Control-M job using the sp_start_job stored procedure, the sp_start_job stored procedure is asynchronous. This means that it will ask the Microsoft SQL Server Agent to run a SQL job without waiting for the job to finish.


1 Answers

Calling stored procedures asynchronously from the client can be a royal pain - you have to consider multiple threads, BeginXXX and EndXXX methods, use callbacks and the application must remain active until it's completed - otherwise a rollback might occur. Yes, it's possible - have a peek at this answer: Asynchronous call of a SQL Server stored procedure in C#

There might be an easier way - why not make the stored procedure asynchronous? With Service Broker you can create a simple queue that activates a stored procedure. The calling stored procedure does not have to wait for a response. It simply creates a new conversation passing in the details of the request and immediately returns. The activated stored procedure is what does all the heavy lifting which could take seconds, minutes or hours - but that doesn't really matter to the UI because it's not sitting around waiting for a response. Even if your UI shuts down, the asynchronous stored procedure would run until completion.

http://rusanu.com/2009/08/05/asynchronous-procedure-execution/

like image 95
Chris Gessler Avatar answered Nov 02 '22 23:11

Chris Gessler