Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Examples of good gotos in C or C++ [closed]

Tags:

c++

c

goto

People also ask

What is goto give an example?

The use of goto statement may lead to code that is buggy and hard to follow. For example, one: for (i = 0; i < number; ++i) { test += i; goto two; } two: if (test > 5) { goto three; } ... .. ... Also, the goto statement allows you to do bad stuff such as jump out of the scope.

Is goto good in C?

NOTE − Use of goto statement is highly discouraged in any programming language because it makes difficult to trace the control flow of a program, making the program hard to understand and hard to modify. Any program that uses a goto can be rewritten to avoid them.

What is the use of goto and labels in C?

goto is a jumping statement in c language, which transfer the program's control from one statement to another statement (where label is defined). goto can transfer the program's within the same block and there must a label, where you want to transfer program's control.


Heres one trick I've heard of people using. I've never seen it in the wild though. And it only applies to C because C++ has RAII to do this more idiomatically.

void foo()
{
    if (!doA())
        goto exit;
    if (!doB())
        goto cleanupA;
    if (!doC())
        goto cleanupB;

    /* everything has succeeded */
    return;

cleanupB:
    undoB();
cleanupA:
    undoA();
exit:
    return;
}

The classic need for GOTO in C is as follows

for ...
  for ...
    if(breakout_condition) 
      goto final;

final:

There is no straightforward way to break out of nested loops without a goto.


Here's my non-silly example, (from Stevens APITUE) for Unix system calls which may be interrupted by a signal.

restart:
    if (system_call() == -1) {
        if (errno == EINTR) goto restart;

        // handle real errors
    }

The alternative is a degenerate loop. This version reads like English "if the system call was interrupted by a signal, restart it".


If Duff's device doesn't need a goto, then neither should you! ;)

void dsend(int count) {
    int n;
    if (!count) return;
    n = (count + 7) / 8;
    switch (count % 8) {
      case 0: do { puts("case 0");
      case 7:      puts("case 7");
      case 6:      puts("case 6");
      case 5:      puts("case 5");
      case 4:      puts("case 4");
      case 3:      puts("case 3");
      case 2:      puts("case 2");
      case 1:      puts("case 1");
                 } while (--n > 0);
    }
}

code above from Wikipedia entry.


Knuth has written a paper "Structured programming with GOTO statements", you can get it e.g. from here. You'll find many examples there.


Very common.

do_stuff(thingy) {
    lock(thingy);

    foo;
    if (foo failed) {
        status = -EFOO;
        goto OUT;
    }

    bar;
    if (bar failed) {
        status = -EBAR;
        goto OUT;
    }

    do_stuff_to(thingy);

OUT:
    unlock(thingy);
    return status;
}

The only case I ever use goto is for jumping forwards, usually out of blocks, and never into blocks. This avoids abuse of do{}while(0) and other constructs which increase nesting, while still maintaining readable, structured code.


I have nothing against gotos in general, but I can think of several reasons why you wouldn't want to use them for a loop like you mentioned:

  • It does not limit scope hence any temp variables you use inside won't be freed until later.
  • It does not limit scope hence it could lead to bugs.
  • It does not limit scope hence you cannot re-use the same variable names later in future code in the same scope.
  • It does not limit scope hence you have the chance of skipping over a variable declaration.
  • People are not accustomed to it and it will make your code harder to read.
  • Nested loops of this type can lead to spaghetti code, normals loops will not lead to spaghetti code.