Ok maybe this is simple but... given this:
arr = ("a".."z").to_a
arr
=> ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"]
..and that I'm trying to change all "arr" values to "bad"
why isn't this working ?
arr.each { |v| v = "bad" }
arr
=> ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n", "o", "p", "q", "r", "s", "t", "u", "v", "w", "x", "y", "z"]
Answers suggested that "v" is a local variable to the block (a "copy" of the array value) and I fully understand that (and never puzzled me before) but then
.. why it is working if array elements are objects ?
class Person
def initialize
@age = 0
end
attr_accessor :age
end
kid = Person.new
man = Person.new
arr = [kid, man]
arr.each { |p| p.age = 50 }
arr[0]
=> #<Person:0xf98298 @age=50>
isn't here "p" still local to the block here? but then it really affects the objects, how come ?
I'll expand upon @pst's comment:
why isn't this working ?
arr.each { |v| v = "bad" }
Because each
iterates through the array and puts each item into the block you've given as a local variable v
, as v
is not a reference to the array arr
.
new_arr = arr.each { |v| v = "bad" }
each
does not give back an array, for that you would use map
(see @benjaminbenben's answer). Therefore assigning it does not "work".
arr.each { |v| arr[arr.index v] = "bad" }
Here you put each item in arr
into the local variable v
, but you've also referred to the array itself in the block, hence you are able to assign to the array and use the local variable v
to find an index that corresponds to the contents of v
(but you may find this wouldn't work as you expect when the items are not all unique).
arr.each { |p| p.age = 50 }
kid.age #-> 50
Here, again you've filled the local variable p
with each item/object in arr
, but then you've accessed each item via a method, so you are able to change that item - you are not changing the array. It's different because the reference is to the contents of the local variable, which you've mixed up with being a reference to the array. They are separate things.
In response to the comment below:
arr[0]
# => #<Person:0xf98298 @age=50>
It's all about who's referring to whom when.
Try this:
v = Person.new
# => #<Person:0x000001008de248 @age=0>
w = Person.new
# => #<Person:0x000001008d8050 @age=0>
x = v
# => #<Person:0x000001008de248 @age=0>
v = Person.new
# => #<Person:0x00000100877e80 @age=0>
arr = [v,w,x]
# => [#<Person:0x00000100877e80 @age=0>, #<Person:0x000001008d8050 @age=0>, #<Person:0x000001008de248 @age=0>]
v
referred to 2 different objects there. v
is not a fixed thing, it's a name. At first it refers to #<Person:0x000001008de248 @age=0>
, then it refers to #<Person:0x00000100877e80 @age=0>
.
Now try this:
arr.each { |v| v = "bad" }
# => [#<Person:0x00000100877e80 @age=0>, #<Person:0x000001008d8050 @age=0>, #<Person:0x000001008de248 @age=0>]
They are all objects but nothing was updated or "worked". Why? Because when the block is first entered, v
refers to the item in the array that was yielded (given). So on first iteration v
is #<Person:0x00000100877e80 @age=0>
.
But, we then assign "bad"
to v
. We are not assigning "bad"
to the first index of the array because we aren't referencing the array at all. arr
is the reference to the array. Put arr
inside the block and you can alter it:
arr.each { |v|
arr[0] = "bad" # yes, a bad idea!
}
Why then does arr.each { |p| p.age = 50 }
update the items in the array? Because p
refers to the objects that also happen to be in the array. On first iteration p
refers to the object also known as kid
, and kid
has an age=
method and you stick 50
in it. kid
is also the first item in the array, but you're talking about kid
not the array. You could do this:
arr.each { |p| p = "bad"; p.age }
NoMethodError: undefined method `age' for "bad":String
At first, p
referred to the object that also happened to be in the array (that's where it was yielded from), but then p
was made to refer to "bad"
.
each
iterates over the array and yields a value on each iteration. You only get the value not the array. If you want to update an array you either do:
new_arr = arr.map{|v| v = "bad" }
new_arr = arr.map{|v| "bad" } # same thing
or
arr.map!{|v| v = "bad"}
arr.map!{|v| "bad"} # same thing
as map
returns an array filled with the return value of the block. map!
will update the reference you called it on with an array filled with the return value of the block. Generally, it's a bad idea to update an object when iterating over it anyway. I find it's always better to think of it as creating a new array, and then you can use the !
methods as a shortcut.
In example
arr.each { |v| v = "bad" }
"v" is just reference to string, when you do v = "bad"
, you reassign local variable. To make everything bad you can do like that:
arr.each { |v| v.replace "bad" }
Next time you can play with Object#object_id
puts arr[0].object_id #will be save as object_id in first iteration bellow
arr.each { |v| puts v.object_id }
You might be looking for .map - which returns a new array with the the return value of the block for each element.
arr.map { "bad" }
=> ["bad", "bad", "bad", "bad", …]
using .map!
will alter the contents of the original array rather than return a new one.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With