For unit testing purposes, is it possible to do this:
?
We don't want our unit tests to rely on a specific external database being present, and in a specific state.
We also don't want to maintain two different "worlds" in our code and tests, the real world where EF runs against a real db and a fake work where our tests run against some kind of EF mock.
This database provider allows Entity Framework Core to be used with an in-memory database. While some users use the in-memory database for testing, this is generally discouraged; the SQLite provider in in-memory mode is a more appropriate test replacement for relational databases.
Code-First is mainly useful in Domain Driven Design. In the Code-First approach, you focus on the domain of your application and start creating classes for your domain entity rather than design your database first and then create the classes which match your database design.
Entity Framework Core allows you to store and retrieve data to and from an in-memory database. It's a quick and easy way to test your ASP.NET Core 6 web applications. Cerae / Getty Images. There are many reasons why you might want to use an in-memory database when working on ASP.NET Core 6 web applications.
Unit tests should not be dependent on any database. Any dependency on database (even in memory database) means you are doing integration tests and integration tests should be done against the real database you are going to use.
I'm not aware of any XML database for EF but even if it exists you are back in front of your requirement: We also don't want to maintain two different "worlds" in our code and test. Every database has its own EF provider created by different company. Even providers for MS SQL Server and MS SQL Server Compact Edition are different enough to make switching between them quite challenging.
What you should do:
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With