Possible Duplicate:
Why does “[] == False” evaluate to False when “if not []” succeeds?
I am new to python as per ternary operator of python
>>> 'true' if True else 'false' true
true
i am expecting for below code output as [] because [] not equal to None
>>> a=[]
>>> a==None
False
>>> a if a else None
None
pleas correct if i am wrong
Thanks hema
Usually, an empty list has a different meaning than None ; None means no value while an empty list means zero values.
Empty lists are considered False in Python, hence the bool() function would return False if the list was passed as an argument.
The emptyList() method of Java Collections class is used to get a List that has no elements. These empty list are immutable in nature.
In Python, empty lists evaluate False , and non-empty lists evaluate True in boolean contexts. Therefore, you can simply treat the list as a predicate returning a Boolean value. This solution is highly Pythonic and recommended by the PEP8 style guide.
The empty list, []
, is not equal to None
.
However, it can evaluate to False
--that is to say, its "truthiness" value is False
. (See the sources in the comments left on the OP.)
Because of this,
>>> [] == False
False
>>> if []:
... print "true!"
... else:
... print "false!"
false!
None
is the sole instance of the NoneType
and is usually used to signify absence of value. What happens in your example is that the empty list, taken in boolean context, evaluates to False
, the condition fails, so the else branch gets executed. The interpreter does something along the lines of:
>>> a if a else None
[] if [] else None
[] if False else None
None
Here is another useful discussion regarding None
: not None test in Python
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With