Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Ember-Data: How to use `DS.Adapter.findHasMany`

UPDATE

Note that this question applies to Ember Data pre-1.0 beta, the mechanism for loading relationships via URL has changed significantly post-1.0 beta!


I asked a much longer question a while back, but since the library has changed since then, I'll ask a much simpler version:

How do you use DS.Adapter.findHasMany? I am building an adapter and I want to be able to load the contents of a relationship on get of the relationship property, and this looks like the way to do it. However, looking at the Ember Data code, I don't see how this function can ever be called (I can explain in comments if needed).

There's not an easy way with my backend to include an array of ids in the property key in the JSON I send--the serializer I'm using doesn't allow me to hook in anywhere good to change that, and it would also be computationally expensive.

Once upon a time, the Ember Data front page showed an example of doing this "lazy loading"...Is this possible, or is this "Handle partially-loaded records" as listed on the Roadmap, and can't yet be done.?

I'm on API revision 11, master branch as of Jan 15.

Update

Okay, the following mostly works. First, I made the following findHasMany method in my adapter, based on the test case's implementation:

findHasMany: function(store, record, relationship, details) {
    var type = relationship.type;
    var root = this.rootForType(type);
    var url = (typeof(details) == 'string' || details instanceof String) ? details : this.buildURL(root);

    this.ajax(url, "GET", {
        success: function(json) {
            var serializer = this.get('serializer');
            var pluralRoot = serializer.pluralize(root);
            var hashes = json[pluralRoot]; //FIXME: Should call some serializer method to get this?
            store.loadMany(type, hashes);

            // add ids to record...
            var ids = [];
            var len = hashes.length;
            for(var i = 0; i < len; i++){
                ids.push(serializer.extractId(type, hashes[i]));
            }
            store.loadHasMany(record, relationship.key, ids);
        }
    });
}

Prerequisite for above is you have to have a well-working extractId method in your serializer, but the built-in one from RESTAdapter will probably do in most cases.

This works, but has one significant problem that I haven't yet really gotten around in any attempt at this lazy-loading approach: if the original record is reloaded from the server, everything goes to pot. The simplest use case that shows this is if you load a single record, then retrieve the hasMany, then later load all the parent records. For example:

var p = App.Post.find(1);
var comments = p.get('comments');
// ...later...
App.Post.find();

In the case of only the code above, what happens is that when Ember Data re-materializes the record it recognizes that there was already a value on the record (posts/1), tries to re-populate it, and follows a different code path which treats the URL string in the JSON hash as an array of single-character IDs. Specifically, it passes the value from the JSON to Ember.EnumerableUtils.map, which understandably enumerates the string's characters as array members.

Therefore, I tried to work around this by "patching" DS.Model.hasManyDidChange, where this occurs, like so:

// Need this function for transplanted hasManyDidChange function...
var map = Ember.EnumerableUtils.map;

DS.Model.reopen({

});

(^ Never mind, this was a really bad idea.)

Update 2

I found I had to do (at least) one more thing to solve the problem mentioned above, when a parent model is re-loaded from the server. The code path where the URL was getting split into single-characters was in DS.Model.reloadHasManys. So, I overrode this method with the following code:

DS.Model.reopen({

  reloadHasManys: function() {
    var relationships = get(this.constructor, 'relationshipsByName');
    this.updateRecordArraysLater();
    relationships.forEach(function(name, relationship) {
      if (relationship.kind === 'hasMany') {

        // BEGIN FIX FOR OPAQUE HASMANY DATA
        var cachedValue = this.cacheFor(relationship.key);
        var idsOrReferencesOrOpaque = this._data.hasMany[relationship.key] || [];
        if(cachedValue && !Ember.isArray(idsOrReferencesOrOpaque)){
          var adapter = this.store.adapterForType(relationship.type);
          var reloadBehavior = relationship.options.reloadBehavior;
          relationship.name = relationship.name || relationship.key; // workaround bug in DS.Model.clearHasMany()?
          if (adapter && adapter.findHasMany) {
            switch (reloadBehavior) {
              case 'ignore':
                //FIXME: Should probably replace this._data with references/ids, currently has a string!
                break;
              case 'force':
              case 'reset':
              default:
                this.clearHasMany(relationship);
                cachedValue.set('isLoaded', false);
                if (reloadBehavior == 'force' || Ember.meta(this).watching[relationship.key]) {
                  // reload the data now...
                  adapter.findHasMany(this.store, this, relationship, idsOrReferencesOrOpaque);
                } else {
                  // force getter code to rerun next time the property is accessed...
                  delete Ember.meta(this).cache[relationship.key];
                }
                break;
            }
          } else if (idsOrReferencesOrOpaque !== undefined) {
            Ember.assert("You tried to load many records but you have no adapter (for " + type + ")", adapter);
            Ember.assert("You tried to load many records but your adapter does not implement `findHasMany`", adapter.findHasMany);
          }  
        } else {
          this.hasManyDidChange(relationship.key);
        }
        //- this.hasManyDidChange(relationship.key);
        // END FIX FOR OPAQUE HASMANY DATA

      }
    }, this);
  }

});

With that addition, using URL-based hasManys is almost usable, with two main remaining problems:

First, inverse belongsTo relationships don't work correctly--you'll have to remove them all. This appears to be a problem with the way RecordArrays are done using ArrayProxies, but it's complicated. When the parent record gets reloaded, both relationships get processed for "removal", so while a loop is iterating over the array, the belongsTo disassociation code removes items from the array at the same time and then the loop freaks out because it tries to access an index that is no longer there. I haven't figured this one out yet, and it's tough.

Second, it's often inefficient--I end up reloading the hasMany from the server too often...but at least maybe I can work around this by sending a few cache headers on the server side.

Anyone trying to use the solutions in this question, I suggest you add the code above to your app, it may get you somewhere finally. But this really needs to get fixed in Ember Data for it to work right, I think.

I'm hoping this gets better supported eventually. On the one hand, the JSONAPI direction they're going explicitly says that this kind of thing is part of the spec. But on the other hand, Ember Data 0.13 (or rev 12?) changed the default serialized format so that if you want to do this, your URL has to be in a JSON property called *_ids... e.g. child_object_ids ... when it's not even IDs you're sending in this case! This seems to suggest that not using an array of IDs is not high on their list of use-cases. Any Ember Data devs reading this: PLEASE SUPPORT THIS FEATURE!

Welcome further thoughts on this!

like image 365
S'pht'Kr Avatar asked Jan 17 '13 15:01

S'pht'Kr


2 Answers

Instead of an array of ids, the payload needs to contain "something else" than an array.

In the case of the RESTAdapter, the returned JSON is like that:

{blog: {id: 1, comments: [1, 2, 3]}

If you want to handle manually/differently the association, you can return a JSON like that instead:

{blog: {id: 1, comments: "/posts/1/comments"}

It's up to your adapter then to fetch the data from the specified URL.

See the associated test: https://github.com/emberjs/data/blob/master/packages/ember-data/tests/integration/has_many_test.js#L112

like image 89
Cyril Fluck Avatar answered Nov 05 '22 02:11

Cyril Fluck


I was glad to find this post, helped me. Here is my version, based off the current ember-data and your code.

findHasMany: function(store, record, relationship, details) {
    var adapter = this;
    var serializer = this.get('serializer');
    var type = relationship.type;
    var root = this.rootForType(type);
    var url = (typeof(details) == 'string' || details instanceof String) ? details : this.buildURL(root);
    return this.ajax(url, "GET", {}).then(function(json) {
            adapter.didFindMany(store, type, json);
            var list = $.map(json[relationship.key], function(o){ return serializer.extractId(type, o);});
            store.loadHasMany(record, relationship.key, list);
        }).then(null, $.rejectionHandler);
},

for the reload issue, I did this, based on code I found in another spot, inside the serializer I overrode:

materializeHasMany: function(name, record, hash, relationship) {
    var type = record.constructor,
            key = this._keyForHasMany(type, relationship.key),
            cache = record.cacheFor('data');
    if(cache) {
        var hasMany = cache.hasMany[relationship.key];
        if (typeof(hasMany) == 'object' || hasMany instanceof Object) {
            record.materializeHasMany(name, hasMany);
            return;
        }
    }
    var value = this.extractHasMany(type, hash, key);
    record.materializeHasMany(name, value);
}

I'm still working on figuring out paging, since some of the collections I'm working with need it.

like image 38
sfossen Avatar answered Nov 05 '22 02:11

sfossen