Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

EF 6 database first: How to update stored procedures?

We are using Entity Framework 6.0.0 and use database first (like this) to generate code from tables and stored procedures. This seems to work great, except that changes in stored procedures are not reflected when updating or refreshing the model. Adding a column to a table is reflected, but not adding a field to a stored procedure.

It is interesting that if I go to the Model Browser, right click the stored procedure, select Add Function Import and click the button Get Column Information we can see the correct columns. This means that the model knows of the columns, but does not manage to update the generated code.

There is one workaround, and that is to delete the generated stored procedure before updating the model. This works as long as you have not made any edits on the stored procedure. Does anyone know of a way to avoid this workaround?

I am using Visual Studio 2013 with all the latest updates as of early December 2013.

Thanks in advance!

Update 1: andersr's answer helped in one case, where the stored procedure used a temporary table, so i gave him +1, but it still does not solve the main problem of updating simple stored procedures.

Update 2: shimron's comment below links to a question about the same issues in EF 3.5. It seems the same is still true for EF 6.0. Read it for an alternative way of doing it, but my conclusion as of now is that the simplest way of doing it is to delete the generated stored procedure before updating the model. Use partial classes if you want to do something fancy.

like image 736
Halvard Avatar asked Dec 11 '13 11:12

Halvard


People also ask

How do you update a stored procedure in Entity Framework 6 first?

Go to "Model Browser" > "Function Imports" > find the desired stored procedure class > right click and click on "Edit" In "Edit Function Import" form, in "Returns a Collection Of" section, click on "Update" button. Click "OK" to finish the refresh.

How do you update a stored procedure in code first in Entity Framework?

To use a Stored Procedure with the Code First model, we need to override the OnModelCreating method of DBContext and add the following code to map the Stored Procedure. The MapToStoreProcedures method has two overloaded methods, one method is without a parameter.

Can you update a stored procedure?

Use SQL Server Management StudioExpand Stored Procedures, right-click the procedure to modify, and then select Modify. Modify the text of the stored procedure. To test the syntax, on the Query menu, select Parse. To save the modifications to the procedure definition, on the Query menu, select Execute.

How can we use stored procedure in Entity Framework database first approach?

Open the SchoolModel. Store node and then open the Stored Procedures node. Then right-click the GetCourses stored procedure and select Add Function Import. In the Add Function Import dialog box, under Returns a Collection Of select Entities, and then select Course as the entity type returned.


2 Answers

Based on this answer by DaveD, these steps address the issue:

  1. In your .edmx, rt-click and select Model Browser.
  2. Within the Model Browser (in VS 2015 default configuration, it is a tab within the Solution Explorer), expand Function Imports under the model.
  3. Double-click your stored procedure.
  4. Click the Update button next to Returns a Collection Of - Complex (if not returning a scalar or entity)
  5. Click okay then save your .edmx to reflect field changes to your stored procedure throughout your project.
like image 108
Rick V Avatar answered Nov 09 '22 00:11

Rick V


Does your stored procedures return data from temporary tables by any chance ? EF does not seem to support this, see EF4 - The selected stored procedure returns no columns for more information.

However, the stored procedure will as you observed, be available in the Model Browser. I did a quick test featuring the scenario described above. The stored procedure was generated in my context class, but the return type was an int rather than a complex type. See the link above for potential workarounds.

like image 30
andersr Avatar answered Nov 09 '22 02:11

andersr