I have problems binding both a telerik RadGrid and a plain vanilla ASP.NET GridView to the results of the following LINQ to entities query. In both cases the grids contain the correct number of rows, but the data from only the first handful of rows is duplicated in all the other rows. I'm directly assigning the return value from this code the the DataSource property on the grids.
public IEnumerable<DirectoryPersonEntry> FindPersons(string searchTerm)
{
DirectoryEntities dents = new DirectoryEntities();
return from dp in dents.DirectoryPersonEntrySet
where dp.LastName.StartsWith(searchTerm) || dp.Extension.StartsWith(searchTerm)
orderby dp.LastName, dp.Extension
select dp;
}
ADDED: This is the alternate plain ADO.NET code that works:
DataTable ret = new DataTable();
using (SqlConnection sqn = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["WaveAdo"].ConnectionString))
{
SqlDataAdapter adap = new SqlDataAdapter("select * from DirectoryPersonList where LastName like '" + searchTerm + "%' order by LastName ", sqn);
sqn.Open();
adap.Fill(ret);
}
return ret;
MORE:
UPDATE: Based on the very logical and fitting advice from Marc Gravel below, I found that the EF designer had made a very uneducated guess at an Entity Key for my entity class, the first field in its list of fields, Department, of which there are only about seven entries shared across all other records.
This is indeed the cause of the duplication. If only I could change or remove the entity key, but this EF designer with all the business logic of an Etch-a-Sketch is admirably committed to repeating it's retarded choice of key while laughing at me locked outside begging to change the key.
Using COUNT(*) = 0. To avoid duplicates, the COUNT or records returned by the subquery above should be zero.
We can remove all duplicates like this by using GroupBy and Select methods provided by LINQ . First, we group our list so that we will create groups for each name in the List. Then we use Select to only select the first objects in each group. This will result in the removal of the duplicates.
Dynamic 1.0. 8. This package has been deprecated as it is legacy and is no longer maintained.
Generally, tables or result sets sometimes contain duplicate records. Most of the times it is allowed but sometimes it is required to stop duplicate records. It is required to identify duplicate records and remove them from the table.
It looks to me like you have a borked primary key. The "identity management" aspect of LINQ-to-SQL and EF means that it is obliged to give you back the same instance whenever it sees the same primary key value(s) for the same object type.
For example, given the data:
id | name | ...
-------+------------+------
1 | Fred | ...
2 | Barney | ...
1 | Wilma | ...
1 | Betty | ...
Then if it thinks id
is a primary key when iterating over the objects from LINQ, it is forced to give you "Fred", "Barney", "Fred", "Fred". Essentially, when it sees id
1 again, it doesn't even look at the other columns - it simply fetches the instance with id
1 from the identity cache - and gives you the same Fred instance it gave you previously. If it doesn't think id
is a primary key, it will treat each row as a separate object (and so what if it has the same value in one of the fields as another record - that isn't exactly unusual).
I would advise checking that any fields you have marked as a primary key (in your DBML/EDM model) really are unique per row. In the case above, the id
column clearly doesn't represent a unique identifier, so is not suitable as a primary key. Just unmark it as such in the LINQ-to-SQL / EF designer.
update: in particular, look at the "Entity Key" property for the various properties in the designer - especially if you are querying a view. Check that "Entity Key" is only set to true for suitable columns (i.e. those that make the row unique). If it is set incorrectly, set it to false. This is also visible as the yellow key icon - this should only appear on things that genuinely are unique identifiers for a record.
And if you wrap the link query in a parenthesis and use the .Distinct() extension?
public IEnumerable<DirectoryPersonEntry> FindPersons(string searchTerm)
{
DirectoryEntities dents = new DirectoryEntities();
return (from dp in dents.DirectoryPersonEntrySet
where dp.LastName.StartsWith(searchTerm) || dp.Extension.StartsWith(searchTerm)
orderby dp.LastName, dp.Extension
select dp).Distinct();
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With