I've come to know this concept of AsNoTracking()
, DetectChanges()
, and AutoDetectChangesEnabled
very recently. I understand that when fetching records from the database via Entity Framework with AsNoTracking()
used, then Entity Framework does not track any changes on those records and updating any property of the fetched record will fail in that case.
My question is if records are fetched in that manner, will it also cause disabling the automatic call to DetectChanges() or does that have to be done explicitly by setting:
Context.Configuration.AutoDetectChangesEnabled = false;
Also kindly let me know what impact (in terms of performance) does it have if both of the actions are performed while fetching the data strictly for read only purposes:
Context.Configuration.AutoDetectChangesEnabled = false; Context.Set<T>().AsNoTracking();
AsNoTracking() . This optimisation allows you to tell Entity Framework not to track the results of a query. This means that Entity Framework performs no additional processing or storage of the entities which are returned by the query.
AsNoTracking(IQueryable)Returns a new query where the entities returned will not be cached in the DbContext or ObjectContext. This method works by calling the AsNoTracking method of the underlying query object.
The AsNoTracking() method returns a new query where the change tracker will not track any of the entities that are returned. If the entity instances are modified, this will not be detected by the change tracker, and SaveChanges() will not persist those changes to the database.
Detect Changes works by detecting the differences between the current property values of the entity and the original property values that are stored in a snapshot when the entity was queried or attached.
will it also cause disabling the automatic call to DetectChanges()
No it won't. But you must realize that AsNoTracking
and DetectChanges
have nothing to do with each other (apart from being part of EF). Objects fetched with AsNoTracking
will never be change detected anyway, whether AutoDetectChanges is enabled or not. Besides, AsNoTracking
works on a DbSet
level, AutoDetectChangesEnabled
on the context level. It would be bad to have a DbSet
method affect the whole context.
or that [setting
AutoDetectChangesEnabled
] has to be done explicitly
Well, you probably just shouldn't disable AutoDetectChanges. If you do it you must know what you do.
what impact(in terms of performance) does it have if both of the action is performed
As said, they are not related. They can both improve performance in their own way.
AsNoTracking
is great if you want to fetch read-only data. It has no side effects (as in: its effect is clear)Setting AutoDetectChangesEnabled = false
stops automatic calls of DetectChanges
(which can be numerous), but it has side effects you need to be aware of. From Lerman & Miller's book DbContext:
Working out when DetectChanges needs to be called isn’t as trivial as it may appear. The Entity Framework team strongly recommends that you only swap to manually calling DetectChanges if you are experiencing performance issues. It’s also recommended to only opt out of automatic DetectChanges for poorly performing sections of code and to reenable it once the section in question has finished executing.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With