Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Does garbage collection run during debug?

I have a program that opens an Excel COM object, does some stuff, and closes it. Then I want to move that file after it's closed. This works fine if I run the program without break points. But, if I step into something in debug mode before I attempt to move the file I get an IOException: "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process."

So what's the deal? Is garbage collection performing better while a program is allowed to run at full speed as opposed to while I am stepping through it? Is stepping through my code doing more than just very slowly running it? Are there other consequences to the debug mode? Other errors that are encountered simply because I am in debug and not running an exe?

like image 541
Brad Avatar asked Aug 23 '11 17:08

Brad


People also ask

What triggers garbage collection?

When a JVM runs out of space in the storage heap and is unable to allocate any more objects (an allocation failure), a garbage collection is triggered. The Garbage Collector cleans up objects in the storage heap that are no longer being referenced by applications and frees some of the space.

What triggers garbage collection in C#?

Garbage Collection occurs if at least one of multiple conditions is satisfied. These conditions are given as follows: If the system has low physical memory, then garbage collection is necessary. If the memory allocated to various objects in the heap memory exceeds a pre-set threshold, then garbage collection occurs.

When should you not use garbage collection?

One fundamental problem with garbage collection, though, is that it is difficult to estimate and manage the actual size of the working set in memory, because garbage collector can free your memory only delayedly. So, yes, when memory is restricted, garbage collection might not be a good choice.

Does garbage collection affect CPU?

CPU usage will be high during a garbage collection. If a significant amount of process time is spent in a garbage collection, the number of collections is too frequent or the collection is lasting too long. An increased allocation rate of objects on the managed heap causes garbage collection to occur more frequently.


2 Answers

Garbage collection is optimized differently when running not in the debugger, yes. In particular, the CLR can detect that a variable won't be used for the rest of a method, and treat it as not a GC root any more. In the debugger, variables in scope act as GC roots throughout the method so that you can still examine the values with the debugger.

However, that should rarely be a problem - it should only affect things if a finalizer actually performs some clean-up, and if you're explicitly tidying things up in a timely way (e.g. with using statements) you usually wouldn't notice the difference.

like image 103
Jon Skeet Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 12:10

Jon Skeet


For the record, I ran into this as well a few times. I found that this works when testing finalizers calling native side code in debug mode:

((Action)()=>{
   // Do your stuff in here ...
})();

GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();

The garbage collector seems to keep a copy of allocations rooted within the local method scope, so by creating a new method scope and exiting, the GC usually releases the resource. So far this works well for my debugging purposes.

like image 1
James Wilkins Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 13:10

James Wilkins