I have the following WCF contract:
[ServiceContract(Namespace = "http://abc/Services/AdminService")]
public interface IAdminService
{
[OperationContract]
string GetServiceVersion();
// More methods here
}
The GetServiceVersion
is a simple method returning some string. It is used as a ping to check whether the service is reachable.
Now I would like to call it asynchronously, thinking it would be more efficient than using .NET threads to call it in background.
So, I have come up with the following interface just for that purpose:
[ServiceContract(Namespace = "http://abc/Services/AdminService")]
public interface IMiniAdminService
{
[OperationContract(Action = "http://abc/Services/AdminService/IAdminService/GetServiceVersion", ReplyAction = "http://abc/Services/AdminService/IAdminService/GetServiceVersionResponse")]
Task<string> GetServiceVersionAsync();
}
This makes it possible to invoke the GetServiceVersion
API asynchronously:
var tmp = new ChannelFactory<IAdminService>("AdminServiceClientEndpoint");
var channelFactory = new ChannelFactory<IMiniAdminService>(tmp.Endpoint.Binding, tmp.Endpoint.Address);
var miniAdminService = channelFactory.CreateChannel();
return miniAdminService.GetServiceVersionAsync().ContinueWith(t =>
{
if (t.Exception != null)
{
// The Admin Service seems to be unavailable
}
else
{
// The Admin Service is available
}
});
The code works.
My question is this - does it utilize the IOCP to invoke the continuation?
In general, is there a way to know whether a continuation is invoked through IOCP or not (in the debugger, if needed) ?
P.S.
Here is the stack trace of my async WCF method continuation:
> *** My Code *** Line 195 C#
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.ContinuationTaskFromResultTask<string>.InnerInvoke() + 0x111 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute() + 0x69 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecutionContextCallback(object obj) + 0x4f bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(System.Threading.ExecutionContext executionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback callback, object state, bool preserveSyncCtx) + 0x28d bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext executionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback callback, object state, bool preserveSyncCtx) + 0x47 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteWithThreadLocal(ref System.Threading.Tasks.Task currentTaskSlot) + 0x3b5 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteEntry(bool bPreventDoubleExecution) + 0x104 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.System.Threading.IThreadPoolWorkItem.ExecuteWorkItem() + 0x2a bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ThreadPoolWorkQueue.Dispatch() + 0x249 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading._ThreadPoolWaitCallback.PerformWaitCallback() + 0x1e bytes
[Native to Managed Transition]
Now, this stack trace looks very similar to the one I get for a method called from Task.Factory.StartNew
, which is indeed Thread Pool based:
> *** My Code *** Line 35 C#
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task<int>.InnerInvoke() + 0x59 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Execute() + 0x60 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecutionContextCallback(object obj) + 0x37 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(System.Threading.ExecutionContext executionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback callback, object state, bool preserveSyncCtx) + 0x1a2 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext executionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback callback, object state, bool preserveSyncCtx) + 0x33 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteWithThreadLocal(ref System.Threading.Tasks.Task currentTaskSlot) + 0x2ff bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.ExecuteEntry(bool bPreventDoubleExecution) + 0xd3 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.Tasks.Task.System.Threading.IThreadPoolWorkItem.ExecuteWorkItem() + 0x22 bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading.ThreadPoolWorkQueue.Dispatch() + 0x22e bytes
mscorlib.dll!System.Threading._ThreadPoolWaitCallback.PerformWaitCallback() + 0x18 bytes
[Native to Managed Transition]
First, you'd need to add TaskContinuationOptions.ExecuteSynchronously
, to make sure the continuation callback is called on the same thread the async IO operation has been finalized:
return miniAdminService.GetServiceVersionAsync().ContinueWith(t =>
{
if (t.Exception != null)
{
// The Admin Service seems to be unavailable
}
else
{
// The Admin Service is available
}
}, TaskContinuationOptions.ExecuteSynchronously);
Apparently, there is no API in .NET to tell if the thread is a IOCP pool thread. You can only tell if the thread is a thread pool thread (Thread.CurrentThread.IsThreadPoolThread
), which is true
for IOCP threads too.
In Win32, an IOCP thread pool is created with CreateIoCompletionPort
API, but I couldn't find a Win32 API to check if the thread belongs to such pool, either.
So, here is a bit contrived example to check this theory in practice, using HtppClient
as the test vehicle. First, we make sure all non-IOCP threads have populated the ThreadStatic
variable s_mark
with -1
. Then we initiate an IO-bound operation and check s_mark
on thread where the IO-bound operation gets completed:
using System;
using System.Net.Http;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace ConsoleApplication_22465346
{
public class Program
{
[ThreadStatic]
static volatile int s_mark;
// Main
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
const int THREADS = 50;
// init the thread pool
ThreadPool.SetMaxThreads(
workerThreads: THREADS, completionPortThreads: THREADS);
ThreadPool.SetMinThreads(
workerThreads: THREADS, completionPortThreads: THREADS);
// populate s_max for non-IOCP threads
for (int i = 0; i < THREADS; i++)
{
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(_ =>
{
s_mark = -1;
Thread.Sleep(1000);
});
}
Thread.Sleep(2000);
// non-IOCP test
Task.Run(() =>
{
// by now all non-IOCP threads have s_mark == -1
Console.WriteLine("Task.Run, s_mark: " + s_mark);
Console.WriteLine("IsThreadPoolThread: " + Thread.CurrentThread.IsThreadPoolThread);
}).Wait();
// IOCP test
var httpClient = new HttpClient();
httpClient.GetStringAsync("http://example.com").ContinueWith(t =>
{
// all IOCP threads have s_mark == 0
Console.WriteLine("GetStringAsync.ContinueWith, s_mark: " + s_mark);
Console.WriteLine("IsThreadPoolThread: " + Thread.CurrentThread.IsThreadPoolThread);
}, TaskContinuationOptions.ExecuteSynchronously).Wait();
Console.WriteLine("Enter to exit...");
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
The output:
Task.Run, s_mark: -1 IsThreadPoolThread: True GetStringAsync.ContinueWith, s_mark: 0 IsThreadPoolThread: True Enter to exit...
I think this might be enough evidence to confirm the theory that an IO-bound continuation does happen on an IOCP thread.
A good read, related: "There Is No Thread" by Stephen Cleary.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With