Take this code:
public int Foo {get;set;}
As opposed to this more complete manually written code:
private int x;
public int X
{
get { return x; }
set { x = value; }
}
In the first example, does the compiler automatically create a private
foo
property?
I am not sure if this convention I have seen of having a lowercase private
property masked by a public
-facing uppercase one is just that, convention, or if it's actually part of the language/compiler, and you can either write it out or let it be done for you.
We can write a C program to convert uppercase to lowercase without using any string manipulation library functions. The value of A in ASCII is 65, add +32 it becomes 97 which is ASCII value of a. So, All uppercase characters ASCII value is from 66 to 90 and if we add +32 in each uppercase character then it will become the lowercase character.
Enter the string: WELCOME Upper Case to Lower case string is: welcome Let's consider an example to print the lowercase string from uppercase using while loop in C programming. /* use while loop to iterate the character array string until '\0' not occur. */ Enter an upper case string: CPROGRAMMING The lowercase string is: cprogramming
The uppercase letter is the capital letter of the alphabet. For example, capital letters are A, B, C, D, …, X, Y, Z. Similarly, a lowercase letter is represented by the small letter of the alphabet. For example, small letters are a, b, c, d, e…., w, x, y, z.
C# also provides a way to use short-hand / automatic properties, where you do not have to define the field for the property, and you only have to write get; and set; inside the property. The following example will produce the same result as the example above.
Why not just have a look what's going on?
public class Test {
// private int myProp;
public int MyProp {
get;
set;
}
}
...
string report = String.Join(Environment.NewLine, typeof(Test)
.GetFields(BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance)
.Select(field => field.Name));
Console.Write(report);
And you'll get quite a weird name
<MyProp>k__BackingField
however this strange backing field name ensures that there'll be no name conflict (you can't declare any field, property, method etc. starting with <
).
Edit: if you uncomment // private int myProp;
line you'll have
myProp <MyProp>k__BackingField
please, notice that myProp
is not a backing field for the MyProp
property.
The casing has nothing to do with it.
Writing a property like below
public int x { get; set; }
will always create and use an anonymous private field which it manipulates via get
/set
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With