Do you always need an ObjectFactory class when using JAXB?
Without it I get this exception:
javax.xml.bind.JAXBException: "com.a.b.c" doesnt contain ObjectFactory.class or jaxb.index
I gather the ObjectFactory can be overkill. But given this exception I'm guessing you need it.. but not sure why?
jaxb package. An ObjectFactory allows you to programatically construct new instances of the Java representation for XML content. The Java representation of XML content can consist of schema derived interfaces and classes representing the binding of schema type definitions, element declarations and model groups.
The ObjectFactory class is part of the primer. po package. ObjectFactory provides factory methods for instantiating Java interfaces representing XML content in the Java content tree. Method names are generated by concatenating: The string constant create.
You get that exception when you use the JAXBContext.newInstance(String)
factory method, where you pass in the package name as the argument. This does require the ObjectFactory
to be there, otherwise, JAXB doesn't know which classes to process.
If you don't have an ObjectFactory
, you need to JAXBContext.newInstance(Class...)
instead, passing in the explicit list of annotated classes to add to the context.
Instead of the ObjectFactory you can include a jaxb.index file which is a text file that contains a new line seperated list of Java classes.
For an example of using a jaxb.index file see:
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With