I think the best way to ask this question is with some code... can I do this:
class MyModel(models.Model): foo = models.CharField(max_length = 20) bar = models.CharField(max_length = 20) def get_foo(self): if self.bar: return self.bar else: return self.foo def set_foo(self, input): self.foo = input foo = property(get_foo, set_foo)
or do I have to do it like this:
class MyModel(models.Model): _foo = models.CharField(max_length = 20, db_column='foo') bar = models.CharField(max_length = 20) def get_foo(self): if self.bar: return self.bar else: return self._foo def set_foo(self, input): self._foo = input foo = property(get_foo, set_foo)
note: you can keep the column name as 'foo' in the database by passing a db_column to the model field. This is very helpful when you are working on an existing system and you don't want to have to do db migrations for no reason
What is @property in Django? Here is how I understand it: @property is a decorator for methods in a class that gets the value in the method. But, as I understand it, I can just call the method like normal and it will get it.
You should use @property when your class attribute is formed from other attributes in the class, and you want it to get updated when source attributes are changed.
Django web applications access and manage data through Python objects referred to as models. Models define the structure of stored data, including the field types and possibly also their maximum size, default values, selection list options, help text for documentation, label text for forms, etc.
A model field is already property, so I would say you have to do it the second way to avoid a name clash.
When you define foo = property(..)
it actually overrides the foo = models..
line, so that field will no longer be accessible.
You will need to use a different name for the property and the field. In fact, if you do it the way you have it in example #1 you will get an infinite loop when you try and access the property as it now tries to return itself.
EDIT: Perhaps you should also consider not using _foo
as a field name, but rather foo
, and then define another name for your property because properties cannot be used in QuerySet
, so you'll need to use the actual field names when you do a filter for example.
As mentioned, a correct alternative to implementing your own django.db.models.Field
class, one should use the db_column
argument and a custom (or hidden) class attribute. I am just rewriting the code in the edit by @Jiaaro following more strict conventions for OOP in python (e.g. if _foo
should be actually hidden):
class MyModel(models.Model): __foo = models.CharField(max_length = 20, db_column='foo') bar = models.CharField(max_length = 20) @property def foo(self): if self.bar: return self.bar else: return self.__foo @foo.setter def foo(self, value): self.__foo = value
__foo
will be resolved into _MyModel__foo
(as seen by dir(..)
) thus hidden (private). Note that this form also permits using of @property decorator which would be ultimately a nicer way to write readable code.
Again, django will create _MyModel
table with two fields foo
and bar
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With