Every lambda should have a unique unknown type.. is it guaranteed that two lambdas into the same scope have different types?
int main() {
auto l1 = [](){};
auto l2 = [](){};
static_assert(std::is_same<decltype(l1), decltype(l2)>::value == false, "Types cannot be equal!");
}
This works but I'd like to know if it's guaranteed that the assert will never fire.
1) Argument-list: It can be empty or non-empty as well. 2) Arrow-token: It is used to link arguments-list and body of expression. 3) Body: It contains expressions and statements for lambda expression.
A type lambda lets one express a higher-kinded type directly, without a type definition. For instance, the type above defines a binary type constructor, which maps arguments X and Y to Map[Y, X] . Type parameters of type lambdas can have bounds, but they cannot carry + or - variance annotations.
But what is a Lambda expression? The term “Lambda” comes from mathematics, where it's called lambda calculus. In programming, a Lambda expression (or function) is just an anonymous function, i.e., a function with no name.
A lambda expression is a function or subroutine without a name that can be used wherever a delegate is valid. Lambda expressions can be functions or subroutines and can be single-line or multi-line. You can pass values from the current scope to a lambda expression. The RemoveHandler statement is an exception.
Yes, each lambda expression produces a unique type ([expr.prim.lambda]/3):
The type of the lambda-expression (which is also the type of the closure object) is a unique, unnamed nonunion class type — called the closure type — whose properties are described below.
[emphasis added]
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With