Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Do I need AssemblyInfo while working with .NET Core?

Tags:

Previously, AssemblyInfo.cs file was autocreated by Visual Studio to contain assembly-wide attributes, like AssemblyVersion, AssemblyName and so on.

In .NET Core and ASP.NET Core, project.json is responsible for holding most of that information.

So the question is: do I need to mark my assemblies with that attributes anymore? What traps can I get in if I will not mark assembly with that attributes?

like image 303
brutallord Avatar asked Aug 26 '16 09:08

brutallord


People also ask

Do you need AssemblyInfo CS?

So, if your assembly isn't COM-exposed, you don't need this. It is randomly generate. In any case, normally, you don't need to modify it.

Where is CS AssemblyInfo?

AssemblyInfo. cs is in the properties folder of the Project.


2 Answers

project.json has replaced the AssemblyInfo.

AssemblyVersionAttribute is replaced by version property

version Type: String The Semver version of the project, also used for the NuGet package. 

AssemblyNameAttribute is now the name property

name Type: String The name of the project, used for the assembly name as well as the name of the package. The top level folder name is used if this property is not specified. 

and so on


Update: With the announcement of .NET Core Tools MSBuild, the .csproj has replaced the project.json. The AssemblyInfo.cs file is back, but most of the settings have been moved directly to .csproj. See related SO question for more details: Equivalent to AssemblyInfo in dotnet core/csproj :

<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">   <PropertyGroup>     <TargetFramework>net461</TargetFramework>     <Version>1.2.3.4</Version>     <Authors>Author 1</Authors>     <Company>Company XYZ</Company>     <Product>Product 2</Product>     <PackageId>MyApp</PackageId>     <AssemblyVersion>2.0.0.0</AssemblyVersion>     <FileVersion>3.0.0.0</FileVersion>     <NeutralLanguage>en</NeutralLanguage>     <Description>Description here</Description>     <Copyright>Copyright</Copyright>     <PackageLicenseUrl>License URL</PackageLicenseUrl>     <PackageProjectUrl>Project URL</PackageProjectUrl>     <PackageIconUrl>Icon URL</PackageIconUrl>     <RepositoryUrl>Repo URL</RepositoryUrl>     <RepositoryType>Repo type</RepositoryType>     <PackageTags>Tags</PackageTags>     <PackageReleaseNotes>Release</PackageReleaseNotes>   </PropertyGroup> 
like image 105
Set Avatar answered Oct 21 '22 11:10

Set


The project.json is not a direct replacement for the AssemblyInfo.cs, so there is still the need if you want to define some values you cannot provide in the project.json.

From the Issue https://github.com/aspnet/dnx/issues/2715 you can see, that in the beginning some parameters, like title, description, copyright, etc. where taken to fill the fields for the generated nuget packages. With the issue 2715 the idea was born, that these values can "flow into the Assembly". So that you have not to configure these fields in two different places. So if you do not want to configure more than these paramters, the the AssemblyInfo.cs is not needed.

There are other fields like [InternalsVisibleTo] that can not be configured in project.json. So there are cases where there is still the need to define one.

like image 42
Ralf Bönning Avatar answered Oct 21 '22 10:10

Ralf Bönning