I assume that public
or private
static
targets must have reduced memory usage, due to the fact that there is only one copy of the static target in memory.
It seems like because a method is static that might make the method a potential point for further optimization by the CLR compiler beyond what is possible with a non-static function. Just a flimsy theory though, so I've come to ask you all.
Do static
public
or private
methods provide any increased performance benefit beyond reduced memory usage?
(Note: I'm not interested in responses that talk on the problems of premature optimization. Certainly that's sound advice I follow everyday, but that does not mean optimization is not necessary at times. (double negative!). Allow me to indulge my curiosity, at the least)
Apabila nada dasarnya – C mayor, maka nada C inilah yang menjadi nada do (C=do / C=1; atau do=C / 1=C).
Apabila nada dasarnya – C mayor, maka nada C inilah yang menjadi nada do (Tidak ada Kres atau Mol, C=do / C=1; atau do=C / 1=C). Susunan nada solmisasi adalah C, D, E, F, G, A, B, C dengan jarak nada 1, 1, 1/2, 1, 1, 1, 1/2.
Lagu daerah ciptaan R.C Hardjosubroto ini dinyanyikan dengan nada dasar Do=C. Artinya nada do pada tangga nada, tinggi atau rendahnya setinggi nada C. Tentu teman-teman masih mengingat pelajaran nada tangga mayor, bukan?
Do = C artinya nada do pada tangga nada tersebut tinggi/rendahnya adalah setinggi nada C.
From Static Classes and Static Class Members (C# Programming Guide)
A call to a static method generates a call instruction in Microsoft intermediate language (MSIL), whereas a call to an instance method generates a callvirt instruction, which also checks for a null object references. However, most of the time the performance difference between the two is not significant.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With