I'm writing a recipe organizer as a sample project for a class. I'm not very experienced with DRF other than using some very basic functionality. Here's the objective:
Create a new Recipe with associated Ingredients. Create the Ingredient objects at the same time as creating the Recipe object.
models.py:
class Ingredient(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=100) def __str__(self): return self.name class Recipe(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=100) description = models.TextField(blank=True, null=True, help_text="This is a quick description of your recipe") directions = models.TextField(help_text="How to make the recipe") ingredients = models.ManyToManyField(Ingredient) def __str__(self): return self.name
serializers.py
class IngredientSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): class Meta: model = Ingredient class RecipeSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): ingredients = IngredientSerializer(many=True) class Meta: model = Recipe def create(self, validated_data): ingredients_data = validated_data.pop('ingredients') recipe = Recipe.objects.create(**validated_data) for ingredient_data in ingredients_data: Ingredient.objects.create(**ingredient_data) return recipe
This successfully creates the Recipe object AND the Ingredients objects in the database, but doesn't associate the list of Ingredients with the Recipe. I assume this is because when I run ingredients_data = validated_data.pop('ingredients')
, the validated_data
dictionary gets its Ingredients removed, so when I create a new Recipe using validated_data
, there aren't associated ingredients.
However I can't seem to figure out a way to keep ingredients associated with the recipe.
Serializers in Django REST Framework are responsible for converting objects into data types understandable by javascript and front-end frameworks. Serializers also provide deserialization, allowing parsed data to be converted back into complex types, after first validating the incoming data.
In function based views we can pass extra context to serializer with "context" parameter with a dictionary. To access the extra context data inside the serializer we can simply access it with "self. context". From example, to get "exclude_email_list" we just used code 'exclude_email_list = self.
The HyperlinkedModelSerializer class is similar to the ModelSerializer class except that it uses hyperlinks to represent relationships, rather than primary keys. By default the serializer will include a url field instead of a primary key field.
I figured out that ManyToMany relationships can't be established until all of the uncreated objects have been created. (See the Django Docs page on many-to-many relationships.)
Here's the working code:
serializers.py
class RecipeSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): ingredients = IngredientSerializer(many=True) class Meta: model = Recipe def create(self, validated_data): ingredients_data = validated_data.pop('ingredients') recipe = Recipe.objects.create(**validated_data) for ingredient in ingredients_data: ingredient, created = Ingredient.objects.get_or_create(name=ingredient['name']) recipe.ingredients.add(ingredient) return recipe
Per request of @StevePiercy, below is my update()
code. However, I haven't looked at this in years and have no idea whatsoever if it is correct or good. I haven't been working in Python or Django for some time now, so take this with a grain of salt:
def update(self, instance, validated_data): ingredients_data = validated_data.pop('ingredients') instance.name = validated_data.get('name', instance.name) instance.description = validated_data.get('description', instance.description) instance.directions = validated_data.get('directions', instance.directions) instance.photo = validated_data.get('photo', instance.photo) ingredients_list = [] for ingredient in ingredients_data: ingredient, created = Ingredient.objects.get_or_create(name=ingredient["name"]) ingredients_list.append(ingredient) instance.ingredients = ingredients_list instance.save() return instance
Below is a helpful example for this question.
Change that part of code like this:
def create(self, validated_data): ingredients_data = validated_data.pop('ingredients') recipe = Recipe.objects.create(**validated_data) for ingredient in ingredients_data: ingredient, created = Ingredient.objects.get_or_create(name=ingredient['name']) recipe.ingredients.add(ingredient) return recipe
And this is the method to edit, cause an error when you want to edit.
def update(self, instance, validated_data): ingredients_data = validated_data.pop('ingredients') instance.name = validated_data['name'] instance.description = validated_data['description'] instance.directions = validated_data['directions'] for ingredient in ingredients_data: ingredient, created = Ingredient.objects.get_or_create(name=ingredient['name']) recipe.ingredients.add(ingredient) return instance
Here is a link with an example. This code is similar to another answer, but if you want to try the code without any problems, you can use this repo. Good luck! DRF Nested serializers
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With