I was comparing an old PHP script of mine versus the newer, fancier Django version and the PHP one, with full spitting out of HTML and all was functioning faster. MUCH faster to the point that something has to be wrong on the Django one.
First, some context: I have a page that spits out reports of sales data. The data can be filtered by a number of things but is mostly filtered by date. This makes it a bit hard to cache it as the possibilities for results is nearly endless. There are a lot of numbers and calculations done but it was never much of a problem to handle within PHP.
UPDATES:
After some additional testing there is nothing within my view that is causing the slowdown. If I am simply number-crunching the data and spitting out 5 rows of rendered HTML, it's not that slow (still slower than PHP), but if I am rendering a lot of data, it's VERY slow.
Whenever I ran a large report (e.g. all sales for the year), the CPU usage of the machine goes to 100%. Don't know if this means much. I am using mod_python and Apache. Perhaps switching to WSGI may help?
My template tags that show the subtotals/totals process anywhere from 0.1 seconds to 1 second for really large sets. I call them about 6 times within the report so they don't seem like the biggest issue.
Now, I ran a Python profiler and came back with these results:
Ordered by: internal time List reduced from 3074 to 20 due to restriction ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function) 2939417 26.290 0.000 44.857 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/tokenize.py:212(generate_tokens) 2822655 17.049 0.000 17.049 0.000 {built-in method match} 1689928 15.418 0.000 23.297 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/decimal.py:515(__new__) 12289605 11.464 0.000 11.464 0.000 {isinstance} 882618 9.614 0.000 25.518 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/decimal.py:1447(_fix) 17393 8.742 0.001 60.798 0.003 /usr/lib/python2.5/tokenize.py:158(tokenize_loop) 11 7.886 0.717 7.886 0.717 {method 'accept' of '_socket.socket' objects} 365577 7.854 0.000 30.233 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/decimal.py:954(__add__) 2922024 7.199 0.000 7.199 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/inspect.py:571(tokeneater) 438750 5.868 0.000 31.033 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/decimal.py:1064(__mul__) 60799 5.666 0.000 9.377 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/base.py:241(__init__) 17393 4.734 0.000 4.734 0.000 {method 'query' of '_mysql.connection' objects} 1124348 4.631 0.000 8.469 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/utils/encoding.py:44(force_unicode) 219076 4.139 0.000 156.618 0.001 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/template/__init__.py:700(_resolve_lookup) 1074478 3.690 0.000 11.096 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/decimal.py:5065(_convert_other) 2973281 3.424 0.000 3.424 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/decimal.py:718(__nonzero__) 759014 2.962 0.000 3.371 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/decimal.py:4675(__init__) 381756 2.806 0.000 128.447 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/db/models/fields/related.py:231(__get__) 842130 2.764 0.000 3.557 0.000 /usr/lib/python2.5/decimal.py:3339(_dec_from_triple)
tokenize.py comes out on top, which can make some sense as I am doing a lot of number formatting. Decimal.py makes sense since the report is essentially 90% numbers. I have no clue what the built-in method match
is as I am not doing any Regex or similar in my own code (Something Django is doing?) The closest thing is I am using itertools ifilter.
It seems those are the main culprits and if I could figure out how to reduce the processing time of those then I would have a much much faster page.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I could start on reducing this? I don't really know how I would fix this the tokenize/decimal issues without simply removing them.
Update: I ran some tests with/without filters on most of the data and the result times pretty much came back the same, the latter being a bit faster but not much to be the cause of the issue. What is exactly going on in tokenize.py?
There is a lot of things to assume about your problem as you don't have any type of code sample.
Here are my assumptions: You are using Django's built-in ORM tools and models (i.e. sales-data = modelobj.objects().all() ) and on the PHP side you are dealing with direct SQL queries and working with a query_set.
Django is doing a lot of type converting and casting to datatypes going from a database query into the ORM/Model object and the associated manager (objects() by default).
In PHP you are controlling the conversions and know exactly how to cast from one data type to another, you are saving some execution time based on that issue alone.
I would recommend trying to move some of that fancy number work into the database, especially if you are doing record-set based processing - databases eat that kind of processing from breakfast. In Django you can send RAW SQL over to the database: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/sql/#topics-db-sql
I hope this at least can get you pointed in the right direction...
"tokenize.py comes out on top, which can make some sense as I am doing a lot of number formatting. "
Makes no sense at all.
See http://docs.python.org/library/tokenize.html.
The tokenize module provides a lexical scanner for Python source code, implemented in Python
Tokenize coming out on top means that you have dynamic code parsing going on.
AFAIK (doing a search on the Django repository) Django does not use tokenize. So that leaves your program doing some kind of dynamic code instantiation. Or, you're only profiling the first time your program is loaded, parsed and run, leading to false assumptions about where the time is going.
You should not ever do calculation in template tags -- it's slow. It involves a complex meta-evaluation of the template tag. You should do all calculations in the view in simple, low-overhead Python. Use the templates for presentation only.
Also, if you're constantly doing queries, filters, sums, and what-not, you have a data warehouse. Get a book on data warehouse design, and follow the data warehouse design patterns.
You must have a central fact table, surrounded by dimension tables. This is very, very efficient.
Sums, group bys, etc., are can be done as defaultdict
operations in Python. Bulk fetch all the rows, building the dictionary with the desired results. If this is too slow, then you have to use data warehousing techniques of saving persistent sums and groups separate from your fine-grained facts. Often this involves stepping outside the Django ORM and using RDBMS features like views or tables of derived data.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With