Differences between .text() and .html() with escaped < and > characters

Question

Given the following HTML fragment:

<p id="para">hello &lt;world&gt;</p>

The jQuery .text() and .html() methods will return different values...

var text = $('#para').text(); // gives 'hello <world>'
var html = $('#para').html(); // gives 'hello &lt;world&gt;'

The jQuery documentation states

The result of the .text() method is a string containing the combined text of all matched elements.

and...

In an HTML document, we can use .html() to get the contents of any element. If the selector expression matches more than one element, only the first one's HTML content is returned.

But this specific difference with < and > doesn't seem to be documented anywhere.

Can anyone comment on the rationale for this difference?

Edit

A little more investigation suggests that the values .text() and .html() match those from the native JavaScript innerText and innerHTML calls respectively (when the jQuery selector has returned a single element, at least). Again, this is not reflected in the jQuery documentation so I am not 100% sure if this observation holds true in all scenarios. Reading through the jQuery source reveals that this isn't what's actually going on under the hood.

Answer 1

This is in accordance with the corresponding JavaScript methods textContent and innerHTML.

>> console.log(document.getElementsByTagName('p')[0].textContent);
hello <world>

>> console.log(document.getElementsByTagName('p')[0].innerHTML);
hello &lt;world&gt;

Answer 2

I think it happens so that round-tripping can work correctly. You should be able to get a perfect clone of the original content by calling $() on the result of html():

var clonedContent = $($("#para").html());

If HTML entities were not escaped by html(), the above would create a <world> element that doesn't exist in the original content.