Can you please explain me the Difference between OAuth 2.0 Two legged and Three legged implementation. And how to chose? Which ones for me?
3 legged OAuth is used when you as a user wants to allow an application (i.e. Salesforce) to access a service (i.e. Azure) on your behalf without the application (Salesforce knowing your credentials for the service (Azure).
Three-legged OAuth processing involves four parties: resource owner, OAuth client, authorization server, and resource server. In other words, three-legged OAuth is a traditional pattern with resource owner interaction. In this case, a resource owner wants to give a client access to a server without sharing credentials.
There are two versions of OAuth authorization OAuth 1 (using HMAC-SHA signature strings) and OAuth 2 (using tokens over HTTPS).
OAuth 2.0 is a secure, open data sharing standard that should be built into every app. This authentication and authorization standard protects user data by providing access to the data without revealing the user's identity or credentials.
First, the legs refer to the roles involved. A typical OAuth flow involves three parties: the end-user (or resource owner), the client (the third-party application), and the server (or authorization server). So a 3-legged flow involves all three.
The term 2-legged is used to describe an OAuth-authenticated request without the end-user involved. Basically, it is a simple client-server authenticated request in which the client credentials (identifier and secret) are used to calculate a request signature instead of sending the secret in the clear.
Implementation wise, 2-legged request are exactly the same but don't include an access token or access token secret. These two values are basically empty strings.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With