I have Googled this and got patchy / contradictory opinions - is there actually any difference between doing a map
and doing a collect
on an array in Ruby/Rails?
The docs don't seem to suggest any, but are there perhaps differences in method or performance?
The difference is super clear if you check the Ruby documentation: #collect: “Creates a new array containing the values returned by the block.” #select: “Returns a new array containing all elements of the array for which the given block returns a true value.”
Map is a Ruby method that you can use with Arrays, Hashes & Ranges. The main use for map is to TRANSFORM data. For example: Given an array of strings, you could go over every string & make every character UPPERCASE.
The collect() of enumerable is an inbuilt method in Ruby returns a new array with the results of running block once for every element in enum. The object is repeated every time for each enum. In case no object is given, it return nil for each enum.
select. map situation, select returns an array which is then modified by map , again returning an array. By comparison, the lazy evaluation only creates an array once. This is useful when your initial collection object is large.
There's no difference, in fact map
is implemented in C as rb_ary_collect
and enum_collect
(eg. there is a difference between map
on an array and on any other enum, but no difference between map
and collect
).
Why do both map
and collect
exist in Ruby? The map
function has many naming conventions in different languages. Wikipedia provides an overview:
The map function originated in functional programming languages but is today supported (or may be defined) in many procedural, object oriented, and multi-paradigm languages as well: In C++'s Standard Template Library, it is called
transform
, in C# (3.0)'s LINQ library, it is provided as an extension method calledSelect
. Map is also a frequently used operation in high level languages such as Perl, Python and Ruby; the operation is calledmap
in all three of these languages. Acollect
alias for map is also provided in Ruby (from Smalltalk) [emphasis mine]. Common Lisp provides a family of map-like functions; the one corresponding to the behavior described here is calledmapcar
(-car indicating access using the CAR operation).
Ruby provides an alias for programmers from the Smalltalk world to feel more at home.
Why is there a different implementation for arrays and enums? An enum is a generalized iteration structure, which means that there is no way in which Ruby can predict what the next element can be (you can define infinite enums, see Prime for an example). Therefore it must call a function to get each successive element (typically this will be the each
method).
Arrays are the most common collection so it is reasonable to optimize their performance. Since Ruby knows a lot about how arrays work it doesn't have to call each
but can only use simple pointer manipulation which is significantly faster.
Similar optimizations exist for a number of Array methods like zip
or count
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With