difference between arraylist = arraylist and arraylist.addAll(arraylist)

Question

What the difference between assigning an arraylist to another and using method addAll between two arraylists?

1 > arrayList = arrayList; //should assign value of later arrayList to the first.

2> arrayList.addAll(arrayList) //add all the data of the later list to first.

the first completely replaces the data in the list ? the second one for appending data in the list(if it already has any) ???

if i do arrayList.add(arrayList) without assigning any data to the first list, will it insert any data ?

I did the following code for testing and found results that i do'not really know.

secondList.add("1");
secondList.add("2");

firstList = secondList;
Log.i("CHECK","first list =  "+ firstList);

firstList.addAll(secondList);
Log.i("CHECK","Firs list add : "+firstList);

firstList.clear();
firstList.addAll(secondList);
Log.i("CHECK","Firs list add 2 : "+firstList);

Result were :

CHECK: first list =  [1, 2]
CHECK: Firs list add : [1, 2, 1, 2]
CHECK: Firs list add 2 : []

i was expecting the last log to have result like : [1,2]

as mentioned in docs.oracle.com

addAll- Appends all of the elements in the specified collection to the end of this list, in the order that they are returned by the specified collection's Iterator.

and if there's no data in the list ? then what will addAll DO ?

Answer 1

When you do:

firstList = secondList;

What you are saying is actually "to make firstList and secondList refer to the same list". After the line is executed, there will only be one list and two variables both refer to that list.

This is why after you cleared firstList, secondList lost all the elements as well. They refer to the same thing. This has nothing to do with addAll. When you called firstList.addAll(secondList), you are basically adding appending an empty list to another empty list, which results in an empty list.