Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Determine the size of a C++ array programmatically?

This question was inspired by a similar question: How does delete[] “know” the size of the operand array?

My question is a little different: Is there any way to determine the size of a C++ array programmatically? And if not, why? Every function I've seen that takes an array also requires an integer parameter to give it the size. But as the linked question pointed out, delete[] must know the size of the memory to be deallocated.

Consider this C++ code:

int* arr = new int[256]; printf("Size of arr: %d\n", sizeof(arr)); 

This prints "Size of arr: 4", which is just the size of the pointer. It would be nice to have some function which prints 256, but I don't think one exists in C++. (Again, part of the question is why it doesn't exist.)

Clarification: I know that if I declared the array on the stack instead of the heap (i.e. "int arr[256];") that the sizeof operator would return 1024 (array length * sizeof(int)).

like image 297
Kip Avatar asked Oct 13 '08 14:10

Kip


People also ask

How do you find the size of an array in C?

To determine the size of your array in bytes, you can use the sizeof operator: int a[17]; size_t n = sizeof(a); On my computer, ints are 4 bytes long, so n is 68. To determine the number of elements in the array, we can divide the total size of the array by the size of the array element.

Can you use sizeof on an array in C?

Using sizeof directly to find the size of arrays can result in an error in the code, as array parameters are treated as pointers.

How do you find the size of an array without using sizeof operator?

&a + 1 => It points at the address after the end of the array. *(a+1) => Dereferencing to *(&a + 1) gives the address after the end of the last element. *(a+1)-a => Subtract the pointer to the first element to get the length of the array. Print the size.

Is there array size () in C++?

array::size() in C++ STL The introduction of array class from C++11 has offered a better alternative for C-style arrays. size() function is used to return the size of the list container or the number of elements in the list container.


1 Answers

delete [] does know the size that was allocated. However, that knowledge resides in the runtime or in the operating system's memory manager, meaning that it is not available to the compiler during compilation. And sizeof() is not a real function, it is actually evaluated to a constant by the compiler, which is something it cannot do for dynamically allocated arrays, whose size is not known during compilation.

Also, consider this example:

 int *arr = new int[256]; int *p = &arr[100]; printf("Size: %d\n", sizeof(p)); 

How would the compiler know what the size of p is? The root of the problem is that arrays in C and C++ are not first-class objects. They decay to pointers, and there is no way for the compiler or the program itself to know whether a pointer points to the beginning of a chunk of memory allocated by new, or to a single object, or to some place in the middle of a chunk of memory allocated by new.

One reason for this is that C and C++ leave memory management to the programmer and to the operating system, which is also why they do not have garbage collection. Implementation of new and delete is not part of the C++ standard, because C++ is meant to be used on a variety of platforms, which may manage their memory in very different ways. It may be possible to let C++ keep track of all the allocated arrays and their sizes if you are writing a word processor for a windows box running on the latest Intel CPU, but it may be completely infeasible when you are writing an embedded system running on a DSP.

like image 84
Dima Avatar answered Oct 11 '22 17:10

Dima