Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

determine that an instance has GetHashCode and Equals overridden?

Tags:

c#

.net

equality

Given an instance of an object in C#, how can I determine if that object has value semantics? In other words, I want to guarantee that an object used in my API is suitable to be used as a dictionary key. I was thinking about something like this:

var type = instance.GetType();
var d1 = FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject(type);
var d2 = FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject(type);
Assert.AreEqual(d1.GetHashCode(), d2.GetHashCode());

What do you think of that approach?

like image 236
Brannon Avatar asked May 10 '15 21:05

Brannon


People also ask

Why override GetHashCode when Equals method is overridden?

It is because the framework requires that two objects that are the same must have the same hashcode. If you override the equals method to do a special comparison of two objects and the two objects are considered the same by the method, then the hash code of the two objects must also be the same.

When should we override GetHashCode?

If you're implementing a reference type, you should consider overriding the Equals method if your type looks like a base type, such as Point, String, BigNumber, and so on. Override the GetHashCode method to allow a type to work correctly in a hash table.

Why should we override equals method in C#?

For a value type, you should always override Equals, because tests for equality that rely on reflection offer poor performance. You can also override the default implementation of Equals for reference types to test for value equality instead of reference equality and to define the precise meaning of value equality.

When should I override gethashcode and equals?

When it comes to value types (structs, enums, ...), these should always override Equals and GetHashCode in meaningful manner as well as be immutable as per MSDN design guidelines-struct should implement IEquatable; and transitively IEquatable should override GetHashCode and Equals (Notes to implementors part).

How does the gethashcode () method work in Java?

The GetHashCode () method should reflect the Equals logic; the rules are: if the GetHashCode () is equal, it is not necessary for them to be the same; this is a collision, and Equals will be called to see if it is a real equality or not.

Why does the equals method require the same hashCode For every comparison?

It is because the framework requires that two objects that are the same must have the same hashcode. If you override the equals method to do a special comparison of two objects and the two objects are considered the same by the method, then the hash code of the two objects must also be the same. (Dictionaries and Hashtables rely on this principle).

What happens when two objects have the same hash codes?

Two objects that are equal return hash codes that are equal. However, the reverse is not true: equal hash codes do not imply object equality, because different (unequal) objects can have identical hash codes. And, that the If hash codes of 2 objects are same, it uses Equals Method to check if there are same of not.


3 Answers

You can test for implementation of Equals() and GetHashCode() with this:

s.GetType().GetMethod("GetHashCode").DeclaringType == s.GetType()

or rather per @hvd's suggestion:

s.GetType().GetMethod("GetHashCode").DeclaringType != typeof(object)

Some some object s, if GetHashCode() is not implemented by it's type, this will be false, otherwise true.

One thing to be careful on is that this will not protect against a poor implementation of Equals() or GetHashCode() - this would evaluate to true even if the implementation was public override int GetHashCode() { }.

Given the drawbacks, I would tend towards documenting your types ("this type should / should not be used for a dictionary key..."), because this isn't something you could ultimately depend upon. If the implementation of Equals() or GetHashCode() was flawed instead of missing, it would pass this test but still have a run-time error.

like image 197
jdphenix Avatar answered Oct 17 '22 00:10

jdphenix


FormatterServices.GetUninitializedObject can put the object in an invalid state; It breaks the guaranteed assignment of readonly fields etc. Any code which assumes that fields will not be null will break. I wouldn't use that.

You can check whether GetHashCode and Equals is overridden via reflection, but that's not enough. You could override the method call base class method. That doesn't count as value semantics.

Btw value semantics doesn't mean equal hashcodes. It could be a collision too; Value semantics means that two objects with equals properties should return same hashcode as well as equals method should evaluate to true.

I suggest you to create an instance, assign some properties, clone it; Now both hashcodes should be equal and calling object.Equals(original, clone) should evaluate to true.

like image 3
Sriram Sakthivel Avatar answered Oct 17 '22 02:10

Sriram Sakthivel


You can see if an object defines its own Equals and GetHashCode using the DeclaringType property on the corresponding MethodInfo:

bool definesEquality = type.GetMethod("Equals", new[] { typeof(object) }).DelcaringType == type && type.GetMethod("GetHashCode", Type.EmptyTypes).DeclaringType == type;
like image 1
Lee Avatar answered Oct 17 '22 02:10

Lee