I'm testing Spring Batch using Spring boot. My need is to define jobs working on an Oracle Database but I don't want to save jobs and steps states inside this DB. I've read in the documentation I can use a in-memory repository with the MapJobRepositoryFactoryBean.
Then, I've implemented this bean:
@Bean
public JobRepository jobRepository() {
MapJobRepositoryFactoryBean factoryBean = new MapJobRepositoryFactoryBean(new ResourcelessTransactionManager());
try {
JobRepository jobRepository = factoryBean.getObject();
return jobRepository;
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
return null;
}
}
But when my job starts, the first thing Spring Batch does is to create the table in the Oracle DB and continues to use the Oracle datasource. It's like my JobRepository definition isn't taken account.
What did I miss ?
EDIT: I'm using Spring Boot 1.5.3 and Spring Batch 3.0.7
With SpringBoot 2.x, the solution is simpler.
You have to extend the DefaultBatchConfigurer
class like this:
@Component
public class NoPersistenceBatchConfigurer extends DefaultBatchConfigurer {
@Override
public void setDataSource(DataSource dataSource) {
}
}
Without datasource, the framework automatically switches to use the MapJobRepository
.
A few things here:
DataSource
configured in your ApplicationContext
, by default Spring Batch will try to use it.DataSource
when one is available within the ApplicationContext
, you'll need to create your own BatchConfigurer
. You can do that by extending the DefaultBatchConfigurer
.MapJobRepository
except only for testing purposes. I has a number of issues (thread safety, etc) and is not recommended for production use. Use an in memory database like HSQLDB instead (you'll still need to create your own BatchConfigurer
to do so).If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With