Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Deep clone utility recommendation [closed]

Tags:

java

clone

Is there any utility for deep cloning for java collections:

  • Arrays
  • Lists
  • Maps

NOTE: prefer some solution without usage of serialization, but with use of Object.clone() method. I can be sure that my custom object will implement clone() method and will use only java-standard classes that are cloneable...

like image 745
Juraj Avatar asked Mar 20 '09 12:03

Juraj


People also ask

How can you achieve the deep cloning of an object?

To achieve a deep copy, we can serialize an object and then deserialize it to a new object.

What is the most efficient way to deep clone an object in javascript?

According to the benchmark test, the fastest way to deep clone an object in javascript is to use lodash deep clone function since Object. assign supports only shallow copy.

Why is clone method protected in Java?

It is protected because the default implementation does a shallow memberwise copy of all fields (including private), circumventing constructor.

What is true about deep cloning?

Whenever you try to create a copy of an object, in the deep copy all fields of the original objects are copied exactly, in addition to this, if it contains any objects as fields then copy of those is also created (using the clone() method).


3 Answers

I think the previous green answer was bad , why you might ask?

  • It adds a lot of code
  • It requires you to list all fields to be copied and do this
  • This will not work for Lists when using clone() (This is what clone() for HashMap says: Returns a shallow copy of this HashMap instance: the keys and valuesthemselves are not cloned.) so you end up doing it manually (this makes me cry)

Oh and by the way serialization is also bad, you might have to add Serializable all over the place (this also makes me cry).

So what is the solution:

Java Deep-Cloning library The cloning library is a small, open source (apache licence) java library which deep-clones objects. The objects don't have to implement the Cloneable interface. Effectivelly, this library can clone ANY java objects. It can be used i.e. in cache implementations if you don't want the cached object to be modified or whenever you want to create a deep copy of objects.

Cloner cloner=new Cloner();
XX clone = cloner.deepClone(someObjectOfTypeXX);

Check it out at https://github.com/kostaskougios/cloning

like image 90
Cojones Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 18:10

Cojones


All approaches to copy objects in Java have serious flaws:

Clone

  1. The clone() method is protected, so you can't call it directly unless the class in question overrides it with a public method.
  2. clone() doesn't call the constructor. Any constructor. It will allocate memory, assign the internal class field (which you can read via getClass()) and copy the fields of the original.

For more issues with clone(), see item 11 of Joshua Bloch's book "Effective Java, Second Edition"

Serialize

Serialize is even worse; it has many of the flaws of clone() and then some. Joshua has a whole chapter with four items for this topic alone.

My Solution

My solution is add a new interface to my projects:

public interface Copyable<T> {
    T copy ();
    T createForCopy ();
    void copyTo (T dest);
}

The code looks like this:

class Demo implements Copyable<Demo> {
    public Demo copy () {
        Demo copy = createForCopy ();
        copyTo (copy);
        return copy;
    }
    public Demo createForCopy () {
        return new Demo ();
    }
    public void copyTo (Demo dest)
        super.copyTo (dest);
        ...copy fields of Demo here...
    }
}

Unfortunately, I have to copy this code to all my objects but it's always the same code, so I can use an Eclipse editor template. Advantages:

  1. I can decide which constructor to call and how to initialize which field.
  2. Initialization happens in a deterministic order (root class to instance class)
  3. I can reuse existing objects and overwrite them
  4. Type safe
  5. Singletons stay singletons

For standard Java types (like collections, etc), I use a utility class which can copy those. The methods have flags and callbacks, so I can control how deep a copy should be.

like image 39
Aaron Digulla Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 18:10

Aaron Digulla


Shallow cloning a collection is easy, but if you want to deep clone, a library will probably do you better than hand coding it (since you want to clone the elements inside the collection as well).

Just like this answer, I've used the Cloner library and specifically performance tested it against XStream (which can 'clone' by serializing then deserializing) and binary serialization. Though XStream is very fast at serializing to/from xml, Cloner is much faster at cloning:

0.0851 ms : xstream (clone by serializing/deserializing)
0.0223 ms : binary serialization (clone by serializing/deserializing)
0.0017 ms : cloner
* average time to clone a simple object (two fields) and no default, public constructor. Run 10,000 times.

In addition to being fast, here are more reasons to choose cloner:

  1. performs a deep clone of any object (even those you don't write yourself)
  2. you don't have to keep your clone() method up-to-date each time you add a field
  3. you can clone objects that don't have a default public constructor
  4. works with Spring
  5. (optimization) doesn't clone known immutable objects (like Integer, String, etc.)
  6. easy to use. Example:

    cloner.deepClone(anyObject);

like image 27
Brad Cupit Avatar answered Oct 20 '22 19:10

Brad Cupit