Why does
struct MyStruct {
auto foo () { return 1; }
auto bar () { return foo(); }
};
compile, but when using a trailing return type like so:
struct MyStruct {
auto foo () { return 1; }
auto bar () -> decltype(foo()) { return foo(); }
};
compilation fails with
error: function 'foo' with deduced return type cannot be used before it is defined
Is this correct behavior on the implementations' part?
In the first snippet, we can deduce the (effective) return type, because the definition is provided at that lexical point—and conversely will not work if the definitions are lexically swapped, which is in unison with [dcl.spec.auto]/10, since we must disallow cyclic deduction.
Concerning the second snippet, see core issue 945, which effectively reopened core issue 643 and deals with this
being used in trailing return types, in which the class type is incomplete still. AFAICS, current wording permits it in the same manner as in the first case (again given proper order of the definitions), but keep the open issue 1890 in mind; vendors defer implementation of questionable stuff until confirmed.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With